Re: [eppext] auto subscription to the new regext@ietf.org

Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl> Thu, 04 February 2016 10:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@antoin.nl>
X-Original-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039FD1A6F5B; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 02:16:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.092
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SH55_NWGNKCO; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 02:16:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from walhalla.antoin.nl (walhalla.antoin.nl [IPv6:2a01:670:6aa4:da00::6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D1D1A6F5A; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 02:16:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.17] (541F474F.cm-5-8b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [84.31.71.79]) by walhalla.antoin.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D9BE28001D; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:16:15 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=antoin.nl; s=walhalla; t=1454580975; bh=Msn0bHdfPr24yURPSJ9TdkaeV/Tv+nsy1xFPCo+zBGw=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=eYi2fnF49WeEJARLYj62m5jwcPcOR/GBpudnoo2CcMzm9m+MFuCDWS9OY6uLa3as4 tpP/6z3VuZjeKSMimpu4Kl+p0no71YlXXIdNcMqGmg/g0WQKFmstWt1VxfqKjURYtb 71Unao7uhLGPJvSFXrpCqdAVBaT9iRTZt01NbpXw=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B8D82B86-0D3F-4C71-826B-A619B2C34B07"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl>
In-Reply-To: <58BB2DBF-DCBE-4194-884E-11715AE52585@sidn.nl>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:16:14 +0100
Message-Id: <7BCFE6E4-B9DF-448F-A91A-584521D8F479@antoin.nl>
References: <25DCAE42-78EF-40F0-BC87-34A53752B824@elistx.com> <58BB2DBF-DCBE-4194-884E-11715AE52585@sidn.nl>
To: Rik Ribbers <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eppext/Sd58QpbhzqFNonxLJvP40IoVLxM>
Cc: EPP Extensions WG <eppext@ietf.org>, provreg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [eppext] auto subscription to the new regext@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: eppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: EPPEXT <eppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eppext/>
List-Post: <mailto:eppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext>, <mailto:eppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 10:16:18 -0000

Rik,

We’re discussing this.
Formally the provreg WG was closed, but since the mailinglist was still used before EPPEXT was formed by lack of another channel to discuss EPP, I guess we should have migrated the provreg mailinglist when forming EPPEXT.
I’m CC’ing the provreg mailinglist to see if there are any objections, otherwise we will aks the secretariat to migrate provreg as well as the WG suggested.
Any objections from the provreg mailinglist subscribers if we alias the provreg mailinglist to the new to be formed REGEXT mailinglist to discuss EPP?

- --
Antoin Verschuren

Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392






Op 4 feb. 2016, om 09:58 heeft Rik Ribbers <rik.ribbers@sidn.nl>; het volgende geschreven:

> Hello Jim,
> 
> And what about the provreg mailing list. I recall that we decided to move this mailinglist also to the regex one.
> 
> Gr,
> Rik
> 
>> On 03 Feb 2016, at 23:36, James Galvin <galvin@elistx.com>; wrote:
>> 
>> Many of you are probably aware of the proposed new working group for the IETF: Registration Protocols Extensions (regext).  Certainly the EPPEXT working group is aware because the charter was developed there.  I have attached the charter that has been submitted to the IESG for review for your convenience.
>> 
>> This message is to alert everyone that the IETF Secretariat has been asked to create the new “regext” mailing list and to automatically subscribe all current subscribers of both the “weirds” and “eppext” to it.
>> 
>> If you do not wish to be a part of this work going forward please just unsubscribe when you get the welcome message.
>> 
>> The next step will be for the IESG to review the proposed charter and make a decision as to whether or not to proceed using its usual process.
>> 
>> If the charter is approved and the working group is to be created then both the “weirds” and the “eppext” mailing lists will be aliased to point to the “regext” mailing list.  The old mailing lists will be removed but their respective archives will remain.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Jim and Antoin
>> proposed co-chairs of the regext working group
>> <charter.txt>_______________________________________________
>> EppExt mailing list
>> EppExt@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext
> 
> _______________________________________________
> EppExt mailing list
> EppExt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eppext