last minute change
Kenneth Virgile <ken@signet.com> Tue, 11 August 1992 22:19 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06626; 11 Aug 92 18:19 EDT
Received: from NRI.NRI.Reston.Va.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06622; 11 Aug 92 18:19 EDT
Received: from babyoil.ftp.com by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10773; 11 Aug 92 18:20 EDT
Received: from signet3.signet.com by ftp.com with SMTP id AA19641; Tue, 11 Aug 92 18:15:12 -0400
Received: from sigmadsk2.signet.com ([192.138.217.100]) by signet.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA00989; Tue, 11 Aug 92 14:37:55 EDT
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1992 14:37:55 -0400
From: Kenneth Virgile <ken@signet.com>
Message-Id: <9208111837.AA00989@signet.com>
To: enet_mib@ftp.com
Subject: last minute change
As you indicated, if you want to remove items, the items should first be marked as deprecated. That is, if RFC 1284 has items that are no longer desired, then the next RFC should have those items marked as deprecated (or marked as obsolete, if you don't want to bother with ever deleting the items). Please don't assume that marking an item as deprecated in an interim *DRAFT* is an acceptable shortcut towards deleting an item. Ken V.
- last minute change Frank Kastenholz
- Re: last minute change Marshall Rose
- Re: last minute change Anil Rijsinghani
- Re: last minute change Donna McMaster
- last minute change Kenneth Virgile
- Re: last minute change Frank Kastenholz
- last minute change Dan Romascanu