Re: [EToSat] A discussion of the PANRG mailing list...

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 02 April 2019 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: etosat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: etosat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5160E120188 for <etosat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 12:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d3upzFaMBwds for <etosat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 12:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2117A12011C for <etosat@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 12:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id y6so12628440ljd.12 for <etosat@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 12:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D3gOSWuI5G0xJov5kLRzj6izph2jqDk4xqoQ0ItwX48=; b=g5yWoVUs+V/RHD6gvA+8E9jAdwnFnuh0hTWKFSiue522b6G1WSNUyKYIqOUbI+Ov42 F9JnxwCD+JbEyowtIwdW/jvHDffI2YPrtHZ9C+OvxSd3lSAhYiqo9p/9CEWV+f1azp4V CB7S23iOsNzL2F25MNV0MWdx9O1PzkGv+YgaL4BLfyDKSNbNW2ga9vdIhDte5nbaFpna wFUzWb6se8ul/t853+hFFq59fHYo+Y6TSOQYOTm+NbwALMvhS3VPbcuGSznYt9dVOg14 cA5M/+KALq7JBAVzflwqFmO/jA379X0MAgPgY9jU9YuX9cwmkiJcU95P2vV7bwkBVeJY zrWQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D3gOSWuI5G0xJov5kLRzj6izph2jqDk4xqoQ0ItwX48=; b=kKE94Y4LyYcH7ql1LLb9E7KhBA7mE9hbaJ75bLDQrrTYs+yBrLd02qtpg/cPxI+x34 GP8O/xVQIMZRxjRgHeUelbc26zdPKxbQ0BYhvyj2Xvtnq2sDB0zm0miR3LVMdEF7sgs+ pGjnddOCDob9v2gC//Ks/5iZRUAaesDEbrarUb2JkejCb8ykiYyYhe6zu7zi3hIY62Gp QhgUoRTnJvQG/zlYXG8qVz43sycf5NfymxDd7p3F71jrtvpZ+6IQKsxrdeteYDtD9W0b CgUnMTZwNDrrAa1AJZTjAJytwN7vUBr4q88PrTMKRwCl+m23vycxpWMqo/Uw72sHzqW4 RHTA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWj7dzcqdHA3DmMtdfuZyvxvEWjkExesiEKdT2rosECyxt36nZh UfUb1dzX+/OTf+3lLQPnoYPuOUdzmGXeeiDJqEM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz0vKymUl6mDM87DqvyitEujhWnGUmsj8HDVdlOtXeS8UqTchJPrm5Hik/Y/eV5eNlJMu3dmL7mbwIPNq6Smdw=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:895a:: with SMTP id b26mr38141007ljk.89.1554233309237; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 12:28:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BL0PR11MB33949B8B0D5B068FF3716F4390560@BL0PR11MB3394.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <5CA394D0.6040409@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <4C7BA27B-14D8-44C9-A5B6-C7FB1E1A1A87@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C7BA27B-14D8-44C9-A5B6-C7FB1E1A1A87@gmail.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 14:28:20 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-eHMutsZY8mX5MQ84hvzDVGyLEiYe0NwxuYm1JKCaqDiA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
Cc: G Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, etosat@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/etosat/D7gGPqgMb8K-UoSB7NwaIufGlEM>
Subject: Re: [EToSat] A discussion of the PANRG mailing list...
X-BeenThere: etosat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The EToSat list is a non-WG mailing list used to discuss performance implications of running encrypted transports such as QUIC over satellite." <etosat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/etosat>, <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/etosat/>
List-Post: <mailto:etosat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/etosat>, <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 19:28:33 -0000

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 12:02 PM Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Spencer took these: https://etherpad.ietf.org/p/notes-ietf-104-pipc

Spencer edited those notes slightly (IIRC), and sent them to PANRG,
with a heads-up to the PANRG chairs and IRTF Chair that we hope to
hold that discussion on the research group mailing list, because I try
to be polite, most of the time.

Thread is at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/panrg/6BJF3SiaJZ2Ie8TQdhN9z6YSfM8.

If you need a pointer to subscribe to PANRG, it's at
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/panrg.

Let the games commence, of course.

Spencer
>
> --aaron
>
> On 2 Apr 2019, at 12:58, G Fairhurst wrote:
>
> Did anyone take a few notes?
>
> Gorry
>
> On 02/04/2019, 17:42, Border, John wrote:
>
> FYI – Last Thursday, in Prague, there was a side discussion about Performance Implications of Path Characteristics. Continued discussion of the topic will occur on the PANRG mailing list.
>
> John
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> EToSat mailing list
> EToSat@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/etosat
>
> _______________________________________________
> EToSat mailing list
> EToSat@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/etosat
>
> _______________________________________________
> EToSat mailing list
> EToSat@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/etosat