Re: [EToSat] A discussion of the PANRG mailing list...
"Aaron Falk" <aaron.falk@gmail.com> Tue, 02 April 2019 17:02 UTC
Return-Path: <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: etosat@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: etosat@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9FA6120173 for <etosat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QNkjjDq9NCPP for <etosat@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA3BF120172 for <etosat@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id a71so8364289qkg.2 for <etosat@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 10:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=J1LcxuWGqN+GaAvSr8FarVWjCl9XCYu5pzQn5WMwJ6c=; b=ESq1V3fmyn3Eis5RztxLsagKmuam/FnKH1Gr2VTz2cggjWMNyRvlCjob8vn08xw0LF X41HgLgR4rTpD88BG8NHVCiiVyoMFXSVT+KkKSlupvvkrIM2APdBXfTw3QjMDRtdy+Z3 z/3+ZPs5QLQO7mcrk8i7yNmtXJdsBFJR88J6ig7w/8B2iH9kopxg+LHw7GXVatSma/MF kGMa+u0mpFVglk2Nv0J0rRpj7jI5Xzf1j70rRhcggld1mRZLt4UZbHm3T3CL960ok3N6 /j8Ys55DkcvVUNuUxCEvVrcGDyIyrDtq+P7TfW7HEnFgieh9M/tEo/+HGyzn0/N7h3d4 H/XA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=J1LcxuWGqN+GaAvSr8FarVWjCl9XCYu5pzQn5WMwJ6c=; b=B6ViiirGzLNYWPmZPuNKcuIQLGdKZ9tEdkg/MyF7TCtTsJhPVZHP/1BztKDJfppNn5 RzqiM33CVlY300L4crSFohW4noT3JEOK+zjkrmikFOjapXqZQwLuBWds15atabT7gnnF iY2rMEOzijAK1xxWfxdx3nJ39sR4GatL+kKrL/R4WeMd4iS8h5qSBtOYkafCUODBnpHz vNCJgGXdqe4ihqQMJCk8AVwTFMvwh6NQKJDBAV0nAH2jaoYcqCEDdaEtmqiAQM1Urf1U p1eE5z++dZQ3tsHuFDVeFUaU1PvEIreNdm6Taz+TRT1ysphckDhCTlsYd1l8EeK3KgMX HnTQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW43W4QPLI7mpBwCJFWDcS7R50wtz7RwnCoR0jX0iCmLZlbC0K4 QZvooKmTFWYMOJ9t6gHuC4tyHoZ4
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx517crmAKE3hADKovfbINVlRsXmA1Y46Bg02wXk5t5eTRA47aLgBKlw3A8spxMz8H50A6A0Q==
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:ef07:: with SMTP id d7mr40750974qkg.100.1554224538644; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 10:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.19.35.194] ([2001:4878:a000:3000:7da3:fd96:5cf2:f98b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u26sm8236377qtb.81.2019.04.02.10.02.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Apr 2019 10:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
To: G Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Cc: etosat@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 13:02:15 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.4r5594)
Message-ID: <4C7BA27B-14D8-44C9-A5B6-C7FB1E1A1A87@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5CA394D0.6040409@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
References: <BL0PR11MB33949B8B0D5B068FF3716F4390560@BL0PR11MB3394.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <5CA394D0.6040409@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_51E5A297-18A0-49DB-B073-28E324D2A6C8_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/etosat/h--gqV_WdUolR21ykC5Q8bRxR7I>
Subject: Re: [EToSat] A discussion of the PANRG mailing list...
X-BeenThere: etosat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The EToSat list is a non-WG mailing list used to discuss performance implications of running encrypted transports such as QUIC over satellite." <etosat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/etosat>, <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/etosat/>
List-Post: <mailto:etosat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/etosat>, <mailto:etosat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 17:02:22 -0000
Spencer took these: https://etherpad.ietf.org/p/notes-ietf-104-pipc --aaron On 2 Apr 2019, at 12:58, G Fairhurst wrote: > Did anyone take a few notes? > > Gorry > > On 02/04/2019, 17:42, Border, John wrote: >> >> FYI – Last Thursday, in Prague, there was a side discussion about >> Performance Implications of Path Characteristics. Continued >> discussion of the topic will occur on the PANRG mailing list. >> >> John >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> EToSat mailing list >> EToSat@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/etosat > > _______________________________________________ > EToSat mailing list > EToSat@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/etosat
- [EToSat] A discussion of the PANRG mailing list... Border, John
- Re: [EToSat] A discussion of the PANRG mailing li… G Fairhurst
- Re: [EToSat] A discussion of the PANRG mailing li… Aaron Falk
- Re: [EToSat] A discussion of the PANRG mailing li… Spencer Dawkins at IETF