Re: [Extra] AD review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-status-size-01
Stephan Bosch <stephan.bosch@dovecot.fi> Thu, 10 May 2018 17:40 UTC
Return-Path: <stephan.bosch@dovecot.fi>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8C4212EB4D for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 May 2018 10:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 917XZrBWjKcU for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 May 2018 10:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.dovecot.fi (wursti.dovecot.fi [94.237.32.243]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48DC12EB47 for <extra@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 May 2018 10:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.168.3.2] (klara.student.utwente.nl [130.89.162.218]) by mail.dovecot.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6427B2B3CE0; Thu, 10 May 2018 20:30:46 +0300 (EEST)
To: Chris Newman <chris.newman@oracle.com>, extra@ietf.org
References: <5AE207FD.8020203@isode.com> <71D1116A-0D02-424B-9B22-58110DD8202D@oracle.com> <D6002572-B87C-47FA-98A1-D963F25F5B0E@oracle.com>
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
From: Stephan Bosch <stephan.bosch@dovecot.fi>
Message-ID: <9e94523e-d12d-e61c-d63b-e54dea7fd33e@dovecot.fi>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 19:30:35 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D6002572-B87C-47FA-98A1-D963F25F5B0E@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/f5SzLT1_HYBuIujvdaWv7vHQDjs>
Subject: Re: [Extra] AD review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-status-size-01
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 17:40:15 -0000
Op 05/05/2018 om 01:46 schreef Chris Newman: > On 4 May 2018, at 16:42, Chris Newman wrote: > >> I just noticed we implemented this in 2005 (under the "X-SUN-IMAP" >> capability). Looking at the implementation, there's a significant bug >> in the specification. Mailbox sizes can easily exceed 4GB; so the >> ABNF for status-att-list needs to be replaced as follows: >> >> status-att-list = status-att SP number63 *(SP status-att SP number63) >> ;; number63 is only permitted with extension status attributes >> ;; that explicitly allow it; such as SIZE > > Oh, just noticed RFC 4466 redefines that, so you instead need a > normative reference to RFC 4466 and then do: > > status-att-val /= "SIZE" SP number63 A 4Gb mailbox is still quite huge these days, but you're right. The QUOTA capability has the same problem: how did you address that? That would have been solved by the 64BIT capability, but that one's on hold now Bron, Alexey, opinions? Regards, Stephan > > - Chris > >> number63 = 1*DIGIT >> ;; Positive unsigned 63-bit integer >> ;; (0 <= n <= 9,223,372,036,854,775,807). >> >> - Chris >> >> On 26 Apr 2018, at 10:10, Alexey Melnikov wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've been following discussions on this document and it is ready for >>> IETF Last Call, which I just initiated. >>> >>> One nit: I believe the following reference is now Normative, due to >>> added SHOULD level requirement: >>> >>> [QUOTA] >>> >>> Please update the document to reflect this next time the document is >>> revised. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Alexey, as AD. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Extra mailing list >>> Extra@ietf.org >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_extra&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=K_BObr5Kfkr3rxt1oBPF9KFiEU3xl9LcD2OOJG3TXfI&m=B73C8TOrpzVRz_O5v_4esOIRwnbdcZoZaulZWKyZwBY&s=Av_oW8rLHO6EMocPg9SJXED-Ta7xK6PRHohZ6tFZmmM&e= >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Extra mailing list >> Extra@ietf.org >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_extra&d=DwICAg&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PZh8Bv7qIrMUB65eapI_JnE&r=K_BObr5Kfkr3rxt1oBPF9KFiEU3xl9LcD2OOJG3TXfI&m=ErU-4WHaHwqAH1nltCBHaf7zbhatpz2gGlB_BH0n3uI&s=HPU9C98qqq9ZOoEpMPOpUKits0ILuqWjGwmCx6_ZCvo&e= >> > > _______________________________________________ > Extra mailing list > Extra@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra
- [Extra] AD review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-status… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Extra] AD review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-st… Stephan Bosch
- Re: [Extra] AD review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-st… Chris Newman
- Re: [Extra] AD review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-st… Chris Newman
- Re: [Extra] AD review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-st… Stephan Bosch
- Re: [Extra] AD review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-st… Chris Newman
- Re: [Extra] AD review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-st… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Extra] AD review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-st… Chris Newman
- Re: [Extra] AD review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-st… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Extra] AD review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-st… Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [Extra] AD review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-st… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Extra] AD review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-st… Stephan Bosch
- Re: [Extra] AD review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-st… Bron Gondwana
- Re: [Extra] AD review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-st… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Extra] AD review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-st… Stephan Bosch