Coversions for the 3.1 draft
xlnt!elwood!mike@ucsd.edu Wed, 07 April 1993 17:57 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10659; 7 Apr 93 13:57 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10655; 7 Apr 93 13:57 EDT
Received: from CS.UTK.EDU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11280; 7 Apr 93 13:57 EDT
Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (5.61+IDA+UTK-930125/2.8s-UTK) id AA14750; Wed, 7 Apr 93 13:36:22 -0400
X-Resent-To: fddi-mib@CS.UTK.EDU ; Wed, 7 Apr 1993 13:36:21 EDT
Errors-To: owner-fddi-mib@CS.UTK.EDU
Received: from ucsd.edu by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (5.61+IDA+UTK-930125/2.8s-UTK) id AA14741; Wed, 7 Apr 93 13:36:19 -0400
Received: from xlnt.UUCP by ucsd.edu; id AA29977 sendmail 5.67/UCSD-2.2-sun via UUCP Wed, 7 Apr 93 10:36:16 -0700 for fddi-mib@cs.utk.edu
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: xlnt!elwood!mike@ucsd.edu
Received: from elwood by xlnt (5.61/1.34) id AA20647; Wed, 7 Apr 93 10:23:23 -0700
Received: from localhost by elwood.xlnt (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA29070; Wed, 7 Apr 93 10:24:03 PDT
Message-Id: <9304071724.AA29070@elwood.xlnt>
To: fddi-mib@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Coversions for the 3.1 draft
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 1993 10:24:03 -0700
Am I missing something or are the textual conventions for FddiTimeNano and FddiTimeMilli incorrect. Shouldn't they be 32bit unsigned INTEGER. FddiTimeNano ::= INTEGER (0..2147483647) FddiTimeMilli ::= INTEGER (0..2147483647) shouldn't they be: FddiTimeNano ::= INTEGER (0..4294967296) FddiTimeMilli ::= INTEGER (0..4294967296) Also how do you represent fddiSMTTimeStamp and fddiSMTTransitionTimeStamp, which are 64bit 80ns counters to 32bit ms counters and not lose accuracy? Mike Anello XLNT Designs INC mike@xlnt.com
- Coversions for the 3.1 draft xlnt!elwood!mike
- Re: Coversions for the 3.1 draft Anil Rijsinghani