[Fecframe] Conclusion of the FECFRAME WG

Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu> Tue, 05 March 2013 20:08 UTC

Return-Path: <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460781F0D1B for <fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 12:08:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.662
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.662 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.062, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HK1VExgt5BXe for <fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 12:08:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu (mailer1.neclab.eu [195.37.70.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FBB51F0D18 for <fecframe@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 12:08:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C74E11035A7 for <fecframe@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 21:08:17 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (netlab.nec.de)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas-a.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2NJlttnTEALH for <fecframe@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 21:08:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ENCELADUS.office.hd (enceladus.office.hd [192.168.24.52]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A33651035A6 for <fecframe@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 21:08:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.7.0.105] (10.7.0.105) by skoll.office.hd (192.168.125.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 21:07:45 +0100
Message-ID: <513650AB.6000208@neclab.eu>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 21:08:11 +0100
From: Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "fecframe@ietf.org" <fecframe@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.7.0.105]
Subject: [Fecframe] Conclusion of the FECFRAME WG
X-BeenThere: fecframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of FEC Framework <fecframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fecframe>, <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fecframe>
List-Post: <mailto:fecframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe>, <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 20:08:19 -0000

Dear all,

The remaining milestones of the FECFRAME WG have been:
Mar 2012 	Simple LDPC-Staircase FEC Scheme submitted to IESG as PS
Mar 2012 	Simple RS FEC Scheme submitted to IESG as PS
Jun 2012 	Pseudo CDP for protecting multiple flows submitted to IESG as PS

All those milestones have been finally published as RFCs:
- RFC 6816: Simple Low-Density Parity Check (LDPC) Staircase Forward 
Error Correction (FEC) Scheme for FECFRAME
- RFC 6865: Simple Reed-Solomon Forward Error Correction (FEC) Scheme 
for FECFRAME
- RFC 6801: Pseudo Content Delivery Protocol (CDP) for Protecting 
Multiple Source Flows in the Forward Error Correction (FEC) Framework


The FECFRAME WG will be officially closed soon, as all milestones were 
successfully completed. The WG mailing list will remain open.

Thank you to the WG and the WG chairs.

Regards,

   Martin

-- 
IETF Transport Area Director

martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu

NEC Laboratories Europe
NEC Europe Limited
Registered Office:
Athene, Odyssey Business Park, West End  Road, London, HA4 6QE, GB
Registered in England 2832014