Re: [Fecframe] WGLC - draft-ietf-fecframe-simple-rs-01

"Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com> Mon, 28 November 2011 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <abegen@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6BA21F8C16 for <fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:50:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NYHp6yViCvDj for <fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:50:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA8321F8C07 for <fecframe@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:50:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=abegen@cisco.com; l=1198; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1322495415; x=1323705015; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to; bh=+dhYEgQWLP4fMq/paOBOiDTmOt3xqdOJnYJXFIRFGAI=; b=e8PS47LDcrJlp0ysW7ngUxgxg7+iPq/IoNbtiOHzrF6L62DuPOFvcbAs WSEiix2DhnByzhgsr0iL/XXTrEiRO0OUGyYoMgH1wTjSAQ1mI3qhBTqV7 rxa7Qp1ldgbqt8Lvz8O+XcnnhK0KzusXTLGXWJtRaxtGymM7FONaTWnM1 k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq0AAAOt006rRDoH/2dsb2JhbABDml6QIIEFgXIBAQEEAQEBDwEdPhcEAgEIEQQBAQsGFwEGASYfCQgBAQQBEggah2uYTgGeO4l/YwSIIZ5V
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,584,1315180800"; d="scan'208";a="16526118"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Nov 2011 15:50:15 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pASFoF9Y008020; Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:50:15 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.169]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:50:15 -0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 07:50:21 -0800
Message-ID: <04CAD96D4C5A3D48B1919248A8FE0D5410650B55@xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABFReBqZKFKygLT=pmz3DXOTc4-mWypvPD8aNAj_-UXEitRYBw@mail.gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Fecframe] WGLC - draft-ietf-fecframe-simple-rs-01
Thread-Index: Acxy6MHYqChNt4IeT1u6DvUa6iYzgg6+LWSQ
References: <CABFReBqZKFKygLT=pmz3DXOTc4-mWypvPD8aNAj_-UXEitRYBw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
To: <gjshep@gmail.com>, <fecframe@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Nov 2011 15:50:15.0463 (UTC) FILETIME=[6BCD3B70:01CCADE5]
Subject: Re: [Fecframe] WGLC - draft-ietf-fecframe-simple-rs-01
X-BeenThere: fecframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of FEC Framework <fecframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fecframe>, <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fecframe>
List-Post: <mailto:fecframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe>, <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:50:16 -0000

The document reads well. Mostly editorial comments:

Intro: I think ALC and NORM have to be spelled out for completeness.
Section 3.1: Why not refer to 6363 for all definitions and use the exact wording from 6363. Alternatively, just remove the text and simply refer to 6363.
I also think figure 1 should be identical to figure 2 in 6363. Even slight modifications could be confusing to readers.
Section 4.3: missing " after "Group of Pictures (GOP) of an H.264 flow.
Section 5.1.1.2: Says "Strict (S) flag", you mean mandatory?
fssi = E:1400,S:0,m:8 should be "fssi=E:1400,S:0,m:8"


> -----Original Message-----
> From: fecframe-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:fecframe-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Greg Shepherd
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 10:15 AM
> To: fecframe@ietf.org
> Subject: [Fecframe] WGLC - draft-ietf-fecframe-simple-rs-01
> 
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-fecframe-simple-rs/
> 
> Please read and provide feedback as we're so close to finishing up this WG.
> 
> Thanks!
> _______________________________________________
> Fecframe mailing list
> Fecframe@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe