IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Fecframe] can we WGLC the remaining I-Ds?

Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> Wed, 14 September 2011 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <gjshep@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6EB21F8B9E for <fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.837
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.837 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.237, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Byw-JVuAn6Q8 for <fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A99E21F8B9B for <fecframe@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkaq10 with SMTP id q10so1720681bka.31 for <fecframe@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wBxMHnZxdUziFMyorhX7e2J+3zLJlSQNm1rmvaoIhhQ=; b=smsSdaiRyqq33zj/IBj2yROw0u8Jh85rTeD0e/UKzX/YNUZutunWOQNkeJvDpF+KgR A51o5g8dMEkcjhFwrbMJNNxl4T1v0FwPr1hZ9fJBai9szEr7gayQjM2qEeXp2IlkcKzs th4kBwSNtaChc/jgzerd7pRxKjdjnoF76JPZg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.129.67 with SMTP id n3mr582411bks.304.1316009020491; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.51.132 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <B7CBAEFE-3315-489A-88BB-21DF5A360AD2@inrialpes.fr>
References: <B7CBAEFE-3315-489A-88BB-21DF5A360AD2@inrialpes.fr>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:03:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CABFReBoGyWg4fDhHE-B_H4tc6M8uCJyrvg3xe_2-Qz76XREiDQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
To: Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inrialpes.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: fecframe@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Fecframe] can we WGLC the remaining I-Ds?
X-BeenThere: fecframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: gjshep@gmail.com
List-Id: Discussion of FEC Framework <fecframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fecframe>, <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fecframe>
List-Post: <mailto:fecframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe>, <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 14:01:39 -0000

Yes!

Looks like I have another LC to call too (I had a mail filter issue, sorry.)

I'll send LC emails for each so we'll have a logical thread.

Thanks!,
Greg

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inrialpes.fr> wrote:
> Hello Greg,
>
> The FECFRAME framework RFC is about to be published as you noticed,
> so it's probably time to finish the WG's pending work.
>
> I've submitted new versions for the "simple Reed-Solomon" and "simple
> LDPC" I-Ds, since both documents expired earlier this month. There is no
> significant difference (these documents were already finalized in our opinion
> at the time they were submitted, in March). I've just anticipated a little bit the
> framework RFC publication ;-)
>
> Can you start WGLC on these documents? Thanks.
>
> Cheers,
>
>   Vincent (on behalf of the authors)
> _______________________________________________
> Fecframe mailing list
> Fecframe@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email