[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-09

Gyan Mishra via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sun, 24 October 2021 00:45 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16473A0817; Sat, 23 Oct 2021 17:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Gyan Mishra via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.39.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <163503631556.3316.15136256360109032302@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2021 17:45:15 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/ItkS25VOVfDg8eLogFDMCtpeoFM>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-09
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 00:45:17 -0000

Reviewer: Gyan Mishra
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-ntf-??
Reviewer: Gyan Mishra
Review Date: 2021-10-23
IETF LC End Date: 2021-10-27
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
This draft analyzes the overall framework of network telemetry technologies
that exist today and future evolution of telemetry technology and data
gathering from a control plane, data plane and management plane perspective. 
Document is well written.

Major issues:
None

Minor issues:
None
Nits/editorial comments:

Section 4.1.3 Forwarding plane telemetry does not include STAMP RFC 8762.  
Mention traditional non OAM based ping ICMP Echo snd Echo-Reply.

 Also for OAM based maybe list the variety of OAM based ping such as for all
 data planes such as MPLS, RSVP-TE,  L2 VPN pdeudowire OAM ping VCCV (Virtual
 Circuit Connection Verification) RFC 5085 RFC 7189, RFC 5586 GACH PW OAM.

Any of the RFCs listed here maybe include as informative references.

Also NVO3 VXLAN and BIER OAM.  SFC service plane RFC 8924 SFC OAM.

Also DETNET forwarding and service sub planes DETNET OAM.

SDN and SD-WAN, PCEP, BGP all centralized controller based architecture can
also be used for network telemetry.

RESTCONF REST API is missing should be mentioned