[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-03

[Joel Halpern <[e-mail]>]

Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-??
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2017-03-02
IETF LC End Date: 2017-03-15
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:

Major issues:

Minor issues:
    The wording of the behavioral requirements for signaling in
section 2.1 is atypical for IETF documents (and in my view makes it
harder for the reader to follow.)  The rules are listed as separate
rules, but they are actually sequential steps that must be test in
order, exiting the process if the condition for each step is met.  But
it does not actually say that.  

Nits/editorial comments: 
    Section 2.3 refers to this as a proposal.  It is a specification,
not a proposal.  Please reword.