IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gen-art] [MMUSIC] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Mon, 27 March 2017 23:58 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8EE21296CD for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:58:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kP2LAuE9-eUO for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x231.google.com (mail-pg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 501461294BF for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x231.google.com with SMTP id n5so47360586pgh.0 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VS6tXlET4Yl8Rxop1jUTtMffHxKtrW5QxkB5iXs/Ej8=; b=a4e+KYVZXK3y5a7+xMmPOP0o1gW70ak+CwKJSGCBOcWqFd/0x4bZReWVcWTeQBnvbi KCs57nWzsi7DEmHJ8nYzb5AjWclFyjfxvVVYF/igrQCsgS6b4+XUeUwHcFE6kQUT+arS noGZ5VxZxwh6A90MJ9WRaWAqdts15iJboNd0Zd5jJ6Z7cujr3OkiG2FVYqpAFQq5ENFW HisT5FBH2gpbAERaIM2YQyaEARYFe9WCfBCrPfJ6VrVrmAlE3PI/mSQG6KXpGw8/S80i jt1DNihs2DshvbxJCYP0lKiwKWq+3BDrn0NmZmlCnfnz/7CsUUaxZn98ywLklrVAS9tW jZhw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VS6tXlET4Yl8Rxop1jUTtMffHxKtrW5QxkB5iXs/Ej8=; b=AyjZfHzVpy5/JD6v2FIqgHO2ULJGOLrWJQD0eZiW7ntKYi/q3a0zpv2Y/oqigZoi+o 5lC4xUF5BHaCQEl6/IFLsJvJY0OWv2LHm47/s0J1VF3NSXsnA55lbvXLYpqiM/EyVijB 1TkW+ePqThxzTBeYfUTBUi9i0En9VuXmu1iuy+pvs4ZYIEO0EfHodunvGybIbgBIHTlJ J5/PfGfmg295kqmVPizFPUC3YXhnsGG+1c8wqv3JQdsXPrhFRkzwmQ0QT09F3ttemJEG Z81Ew2SiETG3rSqLPUytXOaicFWwowPGpgqqcY1yn9eEEnp/py2n6HeOe2S8UpqP2wsR FxTg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3CyISAUYz5yLh4f88dVW1I5f+NxztaSxBMIWpeHLeVTn/MFGVVvXY+3PuWf0P5Vg==
X-Received: by 10.98.141.138 with SMTP id p10mr27506006pfk.111.1490659080919; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-f45.google.com (mail-pg0-f45.google.com. [74.125.83.45]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l9sm3188183pfi.97.2017.03.27.16.58.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id 81so40493274pgh.2; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.84.174.129 with SMTP id r1mr20196678plb.173.1490659080073; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.145.151 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4CB31018@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
References: <60b45113-8012-9a6c-2019-dea5b57ca7bb@alum.mit.edu> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4CB31018@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 19:57:59 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAD5OKxs=e9-a4=ce3KLWBrCSC9d+wBYbn-k4iqeqvEVxc6WftQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxs=e9-a4=ce3KLWBrCSC9d+wBYbn-k4iqeqvEVxc6WftQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Cc: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, "draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp.all@ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, IETF MMUSIC WG <mmusic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c11b7b6f2ff93054bbf1c56"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/VW-4Nvswys-GZcQQ2ym3-oIPRN8>
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] [MMUSIC] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 23:58:09 -0000

Hi All,


On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

> >Regarding the following in section 5.1:
> >
> >    When an offerer or answerer indicates that it wants to establish a
> >    new DTLS association, it needs to make sure that media packets in the
> >    existing DTLS association and new DTLS association can be de-
> >    multiplexed.
> >
> >This text presumes there is an existing association. To explicitly cover
> the case where there is not, I suggest the following:
> >
> >    When an offerer or answerer indicates that it wants to establish a
> >    new DTLS association to replace an existing association, it needs to
> >    ensure that media packets in the existing DTLS association and new
> >    DTLS association can be de-multiplexed.
>
> I could do that. Or, I could use say "make sure that media packets in
> *any* existing DTLS association"
>

If we are nitpicking we need to define what "existing" DTLS association
means here. In this particular case this means any DTLS association for
which it still possible to receive packets. This includes currently
established DTLS associations as well as any DTLS association which were
closed but can still receive packets due to network transmission delays.

Regards,
_____________
Roman Shpount

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email