[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-tlv-extension-01.txt
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 04 February 2014 00:31 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDF21A026A for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 16:31:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GcRzxUZrXPQH for <gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 16:31:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375ED1A0264 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 16:31:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id kp14so7770580pab.37 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 16:31:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DgE6U4cvydxxGemBcNcLNa2wX/fsRDmruHCs3ovTIX8=; b=gb+xS/vKPoACFGC5TKe6u21LDJzJOWKnwvZTAFqf0myQPJ9v0+AsjoWqWaf6kbOlDx hOXufCBXk+7pOgkGfgwKcEHVnYL3fSfvXTP7YYb5JQm9bSAFXk9mfH3Hz/zLUOtCidqw ItxgMz49ecDf+1xev08bEKcVMOj/Vl/NABMOm7QJIkWmrcvofGFqek6kr5iC35N7yKfC wy5O+/Ehd0Xdzn/HYxpXW/96HYUWj9mmJJwQqEexw3YVouLdET33lQg/8f+jTGl9xiJN aKYzI3awaKZFybEsKsn6ZPTy+DRJxkqpWFXN8ExykRUbz2kxz5lC3JHKK2jnvOwtwmQo 8xIA==
X-Received: by 10.66.137.109 with SMTP id qh13mr10673219pab.140.1391473866188; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 16:31:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.216.38.108] (sc-cs-567-laptop.cs.auckland.ac.nz. [130.216.38.108]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id tu3sm60115033pbc.40.2014.02.03.16.31.04 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Feb 2014 16:31:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52F034C9.60802@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:31:05 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-tlv-extension.all@tools.ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-tlv-extension-01.txt
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:31:08 -0000
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-tlv-extension-01.txt Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review Date: 2014-02-04 IETF LC End Date: 2014-02-07 IESG Telechat date: Summary: Ready -------- Comments: --------- This draft is well-written and clear. It retro-fits extensibility to two existing specifications. As an author of RFC 6709 I find this an interesting exercise. Do the hints in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6709#section-4 help, especially bullet 2? Minor Issues: ------------ It is highly unusual for a draft to formally update another draft (draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2), even though the latter is approved and in the RFC queue. If we were a rational organisation, that draft would be updated before publication. (The writeup actually says "The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2) has been published as Standards Track." but that is inaccurate.)
- [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-manet-n… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-man… Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-man… Jari Arkko