[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-12

Ines Robles via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 26 May 2023 20:15 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietf.org
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F21C151B18 for <gen-art@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 May 2023 13:15:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ines Robles via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 10.4.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <168513211080.36834.17875392436463225622@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Ines Robles <mariainesrobles@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 13:15:10 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/kKymWzL6jRgmCfLhf0A8IJATMMQ>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-12
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 20:15:10 -0000

Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-uta-rfc6125bis-12
Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review Date: 2023-05-26
IETF LC End Date: 2023-05-26
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
This document specifies procedures for representing and verifying the identity
of application services in TLS. It obsoletes RFC6125. The document is clear. I
just have minor nits-related-questions.

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:

*Section 6.1: "...a list of acceptable reference identifiers...": acceptable
according to whom? Maybe acceptable can be replaced by something like
valid/authorized/approved?, e.g. "...a list of valid reference identifiers..."?
What do you think?

* Section 7.5: "... limiting the number of names that any server can speak
for..." Maybe: "..."Limiting the number of names that any server can
represent..."? What do you think?

* Appendix A: What about to add a sentence such as: ...the title of this
document is different from the title of RFC6125 because...?

Thanks for this document,

Ines.