[Gen-art] Update to incorporating Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-04

ianfarrer@gmx.com Tue, 02 October 2018 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ianfarrer@gmx.com>
X-Original-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gen-art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD38131051; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 09:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id viEI4fnFyocr; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 09:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73898130FF4; Tue, 2 Oct 2018 09:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.228] ([80.159.240.8]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M6vSj-1fm7dw2ekX-00wo80; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 18:18:53 +0200
Received: from [192.168.1.228] ([80.159.240.8]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.174]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M6vSj-1fm7dw2ekX-00wo80; Tue, 02 Oct 2018 18:18:53 +0200
From: ianfarrer@gmx.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.0 \(3445.100.39\))
Message-Id: <C0C031F1-B87E-4CC8-AD98-9A5FDC5D8E28@gmx.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 18:18:52 +0200
Cc: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt.all@ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
To: Elwyn Davies <elwynd@dial.pipex.com>, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.100.39)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:6AGYtTi12dvsLF+6Np+IgRINRlOzh9a57L1MO7WlIbFYiIefHM4 3UCAfSzHRNf8ttpa9ogDt1AtxRv3BuwhfWd48IDW71/FjeYH6Nqq62waUlecLhSS83ens4Z qFGffaSX2/eZv1qLBtOEPdi/r3iCW/TWHoNqJTOU4j2fDR4hVeVxxuYRwaYXdeMjPLYx4ev RZZfwi7rEPmTsYEScRZMw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:0nAOh9Tbn3Y=:O7N1h/UaHbWS1aJyeX2eh+ /eQk+KkjJJp+pSKrU+IAslFxIAddvDL7O0APLrGPSU+KEz33jjCSR4R+TLd5owztPIyjxXi25 eMc9wusYMGa2is3j0fYprGM5QWb8P3XQXUgS4Nrur/RvirTzvLypYjwhmJBQrex38JqUV9La7 sGpI7mydab1gwjYPJXpY9Wm1pcE1iZO+uZ3Hez3cHUzD3IeohhQiQBZeI7phJWYvmgv7h+cvb xKdzv2bYc3eSV71sdgytCzQv2s7SMxEAb5QVZJ1tsF/b/9hpwY49Bxg0L6hyB/4OT+X66wIWl iwZshrN9FmyWfMWVp41IhRL1t/AEJxcaHZAUpa01NdMcszro5H0de90xMIuBqJfDjfbT5OhR1 fwwufVXOBNQyC6x0vEoxTZObuGM+r0PCBJNDSkUDodmCBF4YcAFMUvK7L1vuUCaYQDMBSLGWf WFDNC5+dk0Yhxzc4+r7OZVRYJAR2vzxbFEkQVJ/sTxhDj0kBwuish0qizGtQpQuHXo5ut9Byw 2csCKwvuQSiqb93VvzyBbN2ds5r7sSYBVCEAcJgNDJ+MMOtOMI6ECPnP0aXjHgksLHJULdv35 eBeU8bfFNWjp1Q0cYTlXWtbESqwND7zbwPdHjsaLgabYNYIPeheaMRUSzZjQpPsq1TkBoT/XA Fc4SlNA0BJ5V6VyjalQ07UYytILnFqaNSnXEUdB8MDmcobrPI2HsaDp+uYlgQFBCqTTNHVViR C/RKUf0xp7G/rzoy+Y2ILtKW7unc7d8uPINypOyQNIGM6DCSbI56lFEXEIXPodFlzlCYPrCba FJIBbpHvSvpjLJFRQXjat2wmYnqoiLNvHbRaXshs4cAqniWpdQ=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/sPhTv9zPAIwiipniwwYFI8_45GU>
Subject: [Gen-art] Update to incorporating Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-04
X-BeenThere: gen-art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "GEN-ART: General Area Review Team" <gen-art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gen-art/>
List-Post: <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>, <mailto:gen-art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 16:19:12 -0000

Hi,

I’ve just submitted an update to this draft to address Elwyn’s Gen-ART review comments. Thank again for the review.

In addition to the editorial comments, there are the following changes:

Text for s7.4 bullet point now reads:
  o  The number of bytes received in the bind-ipv6-prefix field is consistent
with the received bindprefix6-len value (calculated as described in Section 6.1).

References to RFCs 7596 and 7597 have been added to the abstract, and para 2 now starts with:
"DHCPv6 Options for Configuration of Softwire Address and   Port-Mapped Clients (RFC7598) describes a deterministic
        DHCPv6 based mechanism for provisioning softwires."

For the comment about a default timeout value re-trying the v6 binding address update, I’ve taken Bernie’s suggestion (use RFC2131 sec 3.1). 60 seconds seems like a reasonable time interval, but given that the text of sec 3.1 only gives 4 re-tries/60 secs as an example, I haven’t referenced it. The text in section 7.5 now has the following text: 

"The default time minimum time for the client to attempt
   retransmission is 60 seconds.  If, after this time has expired, the
   client has not received a DHCPACK message with the correct bound IPv6
   address, client MAY send a DHCPRELEASE message and re-start the
   process described in Section 7.”

And section 8 has:
"If  implemented, the default minimum client source address update
   interval is 60 seconds.”


Thanks,
Ian