[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-09

Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Mon, 03 September 2018 12:43 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: tram@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud.all@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153597861719.13253.13043738114222950149@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 05:43:37 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/vUYCoiNWsTAjkcTuqjvPZsz_g4M>
Subject: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-09

Reviewer: Roni Even
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-tram-stun-pmtud-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2018-09-03
IETF LC End Date: 2018-09-12
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
The documents is ready for publication as a standard track RFC with nits and
minor issues

Major issues:

Minor issues:

1. The security section says " The PMTUD mechanism described in this document
does not introduce any
   specific security considerations" yet section 5.1 talk about amplification
   attack

Nits/editorial comments:

1.  In section 2 last paragraph "Probe Indications of various sizes" any
guidelines about the sizes and how many indications?

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-t… Roni Even
Re: [Gen-art] [tram] Genart last call review of d… Marc Petit-Huguenin
Re: [Gen-art] [tram] Genart last call review of d… Roni Even (A)