Re: [GROW] WGLC: draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores

t.petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Fri, 08 June 2012 14:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD51021F8928 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 07:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.63
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.63 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.031, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BX+hOylIASlt for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 07:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from db3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (db3ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A0B21F8929 for <grow@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 07:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3-db3-R.bigfish.com (10.3.81.231) by DB3EHSOBE002.bigfish.com (10.3.84.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:10:27 +0000
Received: from mail3-db3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3-db3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9034D3401E3; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:10:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.55.224.141; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:DB3PRD0702HT002.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -25
X-BigFish: PS-25(zzbb2dI9371I542M1432I1418Izz1202hzz1033IL8275bh8275dhz2dh2a8h5a9h668h839hd24hf0ah304l)
Received: from mail3-db3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail3-db3 (MessageSwitch) id 1339164625700260_23991; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:10:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB3EHSMHS005.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.81.249]) by mail3-db3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C89A0047; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:10:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB3PRD0702HT002.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.55.224.141) by DB3EHSMHS005.bigfish.com (10.3.87.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:10:24 +0000
Received: from DBXPRD0610HT003.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (157.56.252.181) by pod51017.outlook.com (10.3.4.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.15.74.2; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:11:13 +0000
Message-ID: <01e301cd4580$208f3900$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>, grow-chairs@tools.ietf.org, grow@ietf.org
References: <CAL9jLabADdWCwDhBdaBJ4fVdk9a=OeJQYFQM4Z_+-P56cVWftw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 15:06:16 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Originating-IP: [157.56.252.181]
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
Subject: Re: [GROW] WGLC: draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 14:11:21 -0000

I would like to see this published as an RFC.

The only discussion I see whether or not the title of 12.2 should have
an initial capital - I think that it should.

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Morrow" <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
To: <grow-chairs@tools.ietf.org>; <grow@ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 7:41 PM
> Folks,
> There's been work on the draft:
>    <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores>
>
> I think the commenters' comments were addressed by the authors.
> Can we move this to WGLC now and clear that 6/19/2012 (June 19, 2012).
>
> Abstract of the draft:
>   "The purpose of this document is to provide a discussion of the
>    potential problems of using private, RFC1918, or non-globally-
>    routable addressing within the core of an SP network.  The
discussion
>    focuses on link addresses and to a small extent loopback addresses.
>    While many of the issues are well recognised within the ISP
>    community, there appears to be no document that collectively
>    describes the issues."
>
> Could there be some discussion on WGLC and  we'll see about  moving
> this along to the IESG?
>
> -chris
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> GROW@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
>