Re: [GROW] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-grow-large-communities-usage-07: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 11 May 2017 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904F6129B0F; Thu, 11 May 2017 08:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.503
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.503 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tbHajGj2HHDZ; Thu, 11 May 2017 08:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA51212EC2A; Thu, 11 May 2017 08:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2010; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1494517599; x=1495727199; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oYrcWLEz4mPYEOkK18SqT1Vpz/corhXc+PAExN/zy3o=; b=hXcrT+HuqxEGoeRFUUfpSYEIRfeU+Kob5bXrqExsqpgBLI4Pj52Hsmyj foHaiCV1AMzENvlo7OYsSkt7/oIZRTiDtYmj+Js4uvbmS8YILD7XnXKZ9 HV5HuqgYoEkj6i7s9sIwCXiCJoGo/iPPHzvqJujVYMp9ItNCmCb99o+aQ U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AIAQAmhhRZ/xbLJq1cGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBhDeBDINpihhzpl2CDy6FdgKFSxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUWBiMVQRALGgIfBwICVwYNCAEBih4OsSOCJop1AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWBC4VUgV4rgnCENBIBgy6CYAEEiUSCCpI8hxyLf4IEhTuDQ4ZpjBSILx84fwsvIAgZFYVxgUw+NgGGLYIuAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,324,1491264000"; d="scan'208";a="694353714"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 May 2017 15:46:36 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v4BFkaGt030757; Thu, 11 May 2017 15:46:36 GMT
To: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, grow-chairs@ietf.org, jouni.nospam@gmail.com, grow@ietf.org, draft-ietf-grow-large-communities-usage@ietf.org
References: <149450519340.16653.912352335267369890.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170511153041.GD7377@shrubbery.net>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <e47d4cfa-c06a-4e99-37c1-0612e1e2a587@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 17:46:36 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170511153041.GD7377@shrubbery.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/J1a_wdiYFEW-cP82Xix0ja5FKLM>
Subject: Re: [GROW] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-grow-large-communities-usage-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/grow/>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 15:52:57 -0000

Thanks for addressing my comment.

Regards, B.
> Thu, May 11, 2017 at 05:19:53AM -0700, Benoit Claise:
>> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-grow-large-communities-usage-07: No Objection
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-large-communities-usage/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Introduction
>>
>>     BGP Large Communities [RFC8092] provide a mechanism to signal opaque
>>     information between Autonomous Systems (ASs).
>>
>> Not only "between": BGP communities might also be used inside an AS, as
>> you described in the "informational communities"
> true; "and within" - would you pen that, job?
>
>> As mentioned by Jouni in his OPS-DIR review:
>> One minor nit I have relates to management & administration to the
>> large communities functions and description of their semantics. Are
>> those maintained somewhere? If there are existing repositories,
>> documentation, etc it would be nice to point out those. The document
>> now hints to NANOG and NLNOG..
> They are not cataloged anywhere.  I think that you are interpretting
> this draft to be more than an example of how one might use Large
> Communities, that it is standardizing the Local Data fields, which is
> not the case.  These values are defined by and have significance to
> the ASN/Global Admin in the first field of the Large Comm.
>
> Does this address the comment?
> .
>