[Hash] Proposed agenda for IETF 63 in Paris

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 06 July 2005 15:43 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DqC46-00078q-NH; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 11:43:58 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DqC43-00075k-U6 for hash@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 11:43:55 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx []) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA12171 for <hash@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 11:43:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from above.proper.com ([]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DqCRO-00024G-1f for hash@ietf.org; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 12:08:02 -0400
Received: from [] (dsl2-63-249-92-231.cruzio.com []) (authenticated bits=0) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j66Fe0lK072791 for <hash@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 08:40:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p062309c7bef1a7a85773@[]>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 08:27:38 -0700
To: Hash WG <hash@ietf.org>
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Subject: [Hash] Proposed agenda for IETF 63 in Paris
X-BeenThere: hash@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: hash.lists.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hash>, <mailto:hash-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/hash>
List-Post: <mailto:hash@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hash-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hash>, <mailto:hash-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: hash-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: hash-bounces@lists.ietf.org

We have asked for a one-hour slot for the BOF because there is not 
much to work out yet. I propose that the hour be spent as:

1) 30 minutes - charter agreement
2) 30 minutes - presentation(s) on truncation and salting proposals and issues

Because this is a BOF, not a working group, we need to be sure we 
have agreement on the charter before the IESG considers whether or 
not to really form the WG. We'll start with the last charter I posted 
(amended as Ben pointed out to make it less ASN.1esque) and see how 
the folks in the room feel.

Does this agenda make sense?

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

Hash mailing list