Re: [Hipsec] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-08: (with COMMENT)

Varjonen Samu <samu.varjonen@cs.helsinki.fi> Wed, 06 July 2016 11:00 UTC

Return-Path: <samu.varjonen@cs.helsinki.fi>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 278CD12D18A; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 04:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.728
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.728 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.helsinki.fi
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f7gM8iadA_3J; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 04:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from script.cs.helsinki.fi (script.cs.helsinki.fi [128.214.11.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6418F12D0CC; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 04:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-DKIM: Courier DKIM Filter v0.50+pk-2016-01-27 mail.cs.helsinki.fi Wed, 06 Jul 2016 14:00:46 +0300
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cs.helsinki.fi; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= dkim20130528; bh=wGcZQJQ1q+69vabFHoRiAGvy9cnhlYmQe4Xz5f/SlSo=; b= aBBWuYtLuLlPI40+gDj7h7Pmu/6BiM9UZm4mH0ghvWaAnrqO2gm3TRSYs7TWtG2P 30hKQDD9ES6jrxhb/0iUJcOumi4Tj3VLd2OkVPt/Argsu/7yRtnE3pCjQ7e1po3u S6GX7ound+06gtXa67n3lHBNrW8clK0lqymW2ksGF7k=
Received: from [128.214.10.115] (hpf-7.cs.helsinki.fi [128.214.10.115]) (AUTH: PLAIN sklvarjo, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) by mail.cs.helsinki.fi with ESMTPSA; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 14:00:46 +0300 id 00000000005A0027.00000000577CE4DE.000035D6
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20160706011332.22267.32619.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Varjonen Samu <samu.varjonen@cs.helsinki.fi>
Message-ID: <577CE4DE.6000300@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 14:00:46 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160706011332.22267.32619.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/EM_0YdKh2qS7ypHeODZ0FhqxOeA>
Cc: hipsec@ietf.org, hip-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 11:00:53 -0000

HI,

bis-09 has a new IANA considerations section that is based on the old one and 
clearly marks the changes to be made to the registry.

-Samu

On 06/07/16 04:13, Ben Campbell wrote:
> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-08: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I agree with Alexey's discuss comment that the IANA considerations from
> the obsoleted RFC need to be pulled forward to this one. In my opinion,
> if the RFC is obsoleted, one should no longer need to read it.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hipsec mailing list
> Hipsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec