[Hipsec] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Alexey Melnikov" <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> Wed, 06 July 2016 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietf.org
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65A0712B035; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Alexey Melnikov" <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.25.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160706183132.26740.62538.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 11:31:32 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/F2ms6QxdEMXzK2RH8PW4b2BCsng>
Cc: hipsec@ietf.org, hip-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis@ietf.org
Subject: [Hipsec] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 18:31:32 -0000

Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-07: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The IANA considerations section does not seem to stand alone without
reading RFC 5204. As you are obsoleting RFC 5204, readers shouldn't be
expected to read it in order to discover original IANA instructions.
I think you should copy information from RFC 5204.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In Section 6:

   This section is to be interpreted according to the Guidelines for
   Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs [RFC5226].

This sentence is not needed, because RFC 5204 didn't define any
registries, so none of the text from RFC 5226 applies. I suggest you
delete this sentence.