Re: [Hipsec] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-09: (with COMMENT)

Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 08 July 2016 14:25 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA3B12D587; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 07:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HQ__lN7nJMgL; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 07:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x244.google.com (mail-oi0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D82A012D501; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 07:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x244.google.com with SMTP id w141so10441108oia.0; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 07:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jnw4rIC8B57l0zPgqgfSooSMAzUUo+s0Y/g7jubuL9s=; b=obafVtMg9vvYwMeWR0vkT5YctHYqG/h62nz70WhPME+pvMxPv09S2+E5V8rqWdJqPt GJtS6NGSkIJLDSHc9RTU13HIkkvE9Jppwg56hDvV55LJgAP3IV0Krl+tlgA0d2kkcKaU InRGx1K7DrNVMM2ldf/wKlw2G972VePAWwOYQuzb8A1hpJHj5o/cWg6R8xJnc5t7upYX WGsaGudv/zJlKBldo39fK5fK3uBz0Qy1RrCusLG/b0IcNIRo0N4YR/7xA70F7P7jQnHo t3YJOmTRD2kfSBI0+pghRj1K4AwgH32KnHogEVIPhwpkieVVi90pUCCq4sQ6BrW/YoNN 4igw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jnw4rIC8B57l0zPgqgfSooSMAzUUo+s0Y/g7jubuL9s=; b=ex/5KSpVGE3XgDxG6k/GvQcsEyMGUEiNmQIN0crDIhsQUMvDfhNUVPI5fR+ofwCtYz +QxphJxtRvDXUES0R76i9BRHxCyqg48rvwspfu5HPh69frS7v8rASXochaPSLXsGRciU GeBC65mPOnbUq4eJt7QP4dq5Rj8jqItwplrjsEcEb33qSId9/SQ+I/vzNqB3lXzsQmdT h6vBcTp0N4h9DeDu7q0cXaojz9nXAjY94r4hk4AmwCWfJbp2IxtoFPU3TwDXI2CF3IRv VYNOMOcpX/+iGLFr0acrCpI7dboHy9aPMT2dEtvqw1rSAD/sWFPqc8S3Z3ch1o6IIwYK Y9Mw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLaj0aX7cxQLGLupeKEzgcQxdoTrPjT3NcPSbzJDFSm+q74IxvLZH3bETQS9oHnu4qiGRlnE0GoYnHc5w==
X-Received: by 10.202.189.198 with SMTP id n189mr3352228oif.111.1467987896226; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 07:24:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.47.164 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 07:24:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160706013706.22302.59656.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20160706013706.22302.59656.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 07:24:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAE_dhjve_bozkW+E2Dibm5245SupKoo9unaoThfN3cn-GS9jVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/wbT-ZNzMTUa6-ybIiz1bK4OkxWM>
Cc: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis@ietf.org, hip-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 14:25:01 -0000

Hi Ben,

The IANA Considerations used to be a copy of RFC 5205 but someone
asked that it be cleaned up. I will copy it back in the next revision.

Thanks.

--julien

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>; wrote:
> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-09: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Please replicate the appropriate info from the RFC 5205 IANA
> considerations. The similar section in this draft does not seem to stand
> alone. Readers should not need to refer back to the obsoleted RFC to
> understand this version.
>
>