IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] RFC 7788 and ".home"

Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org> Sat, 16 July 2016 08:50 UTC

Return-Path: <terry.manderson@icann.org>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5990A12D67F for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 01:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.488
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.488 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B-zhZpSBFGU1 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 01:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-2.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2231112B057 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 01:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 01:50:06 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 01:50:06 -0700
From: Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>, HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [homenet] RFC 7788 and ".home"
Thread-Index: AQHR3zWyxpSNp4RjaE2KKFwnC71EkaAb3KUA
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 08:50:06 +0000
Message-ID: <D3B0315C.95E19%terry.manderson@icann.org>
References: <13d0215f-7868-d297-1cd9-4d50362aa67a@bellis.me.uk>
In-Reply-To: <13d0215f-7868-d297-1cd9-4d50362aa67a@bellis.me.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.6.160626
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3551539802_1119405"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/FKBsbqQal_m8jth-yNN_1iswS7A>
Subject: Re: [homenet] RFC 7788 and ".home"
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 08:50:10 -0000

Thanks Ray,

I would also like the WG to read this draft before entering the discussion
on this topic.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-stw-whatsinaname

While currently a -00 individual submission there is some very good
guidance in this document that might help frame everyone's thoughts.

Thanks
Terry

On 16/07/2016, 5:42 PM, "homenet on behalf of Ray Bellis"
<homenet-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of ray@bellis.me.uk> wrote:

>The Chairs have been asked to forward this to the WG on behalf of the IAB:
>
>--8<--8<--
>
>The IAB discussed RFC 7788 and the appearance of the domain ".home" in
>the RFC. The IAB was happy to see that an appropriate erratum has been
>filed and approved, observing the problem with RFC 7788 and publishing a
>fix for the error. The original text in the RFC is problematic, because
>the use of .home in this case would constitute use of .home as a Special
>Use Name, but there is no text in RFC 7788 following the process in
>section 5 of RFC 6761 and no IANA Considerations updating the Special
>Use Names registry.
>
>The IAB requests that the homenet WG and the IESG follow up on the
>publication of the erratum for RFC 7788 with the re-approval of the RFC
>with a fix as quickly as possible. The IAB feels strongly that a
>correct, formal RFC is required immediately to avoid any further
>problems. Also, sending a timely note to the implementors known to be
>interested in HOMENET may be useful.
>
>The IAB considers the existence of RFC 7788 in its current state to be
>problematic for two reasons: the specification of home in an IETF
>document without following the appropriate RFC 6761 process may result
>in other organizations pointing out that the IETF can't even follow its
>own processes with regard to Special Use Names; and encoding .home as
>the default in implementations may result in embedding this
>inappropriate use of .home in deployed products.]
>
>--8<--8<--
>
>There is some time set aside on our agenda on Monday for Jari to speak
>about this.
>
>In the meantime, please note that the RFC 7788 authors have filed a -bis
>draft (draft-ietf-homenet-hncp-bis-00).
>
>thanks,
>
>Ray and Mark
>
>_______________________________________________
>homenet mailing list
>homenet@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email