[homenet] New version of homenet naming architecture...
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Sun, 10 July 2016 18:58 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A07312D0C5 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 11:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id naIBPsLVjQ2P for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 11:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22d.google.com (mail-lf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 393CA12D0BF for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 11:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id q132so56827435lfe.3 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 11:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=CqoRl3iP0/DSWIC+8zVyqJHtqS28TRVeTzbNl9c8tKY=; b=UyxedlxpA6zBBFouCHxLhsXV/AdmmJjEWj91P+Vl5SzfC1z2xbauZHxgILRsFaoNEz Ti+TWGD2n6RUUfE0ltvvvENvwnYh7GeUqPEvvco+6y7rfRnm8BQ8eYe+z9j+bR6TuXGt l9cgQWoAYSY5Zs4nMNjtFdqaMYqVw1NyiZD3ipfyErLDGFzNyUSpekFZB4ZknCHX3+h/ VbLvJ6inDAzITV5E08eTziZXsVwRVCR0+XWUYpdNjoQyPPXMC3xlyv1mXFMH3OmfZeU4 sKpq4QvCG2iQX+Envnwa2Jo33mJbeE/abr2Q01jGo6EkbDFRWWk5AIr0u0qRkmhnxkC3 lNyw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=CqoRl3iP0/DSWIC+8zVyqJHtqS28TRVeTzbNl9c8tKY=; b=FAOO/QsTD2Lq4Cj9nnmny+RN5MFB2gynwRH+ZhfQdHiOncXp7DmVRuyBMASn6VC3pW sD7epQfShh3GBKPoOSNDrKz6zhvzrJpCX6F/V2OoFt6imx/BeoWpUsB51WPqF3sP1N1S 4xY3yYhbO+ktHq8X+FTVcoqpN2yqhat1RigmiLJYSJXwa6ijqRtDYBihh6ngQBH5ZPGn 0/r3+DZLDyHuX5BwxheU861Gk8PCAAiytCLzQBGF2PAkUh3J4OBbyP4PGCrpp57E0v7w GsCf3Wxzxo4eG1Bxj4xQdGNQaoxp4HR/aproETRYBkswMpvAlktlZ2RCUOOfazd1Jgjp lxlA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKLTgfeUK530G/fmaxyVjLIn6cPHr9mvSD0W4FiKFFtrX4Wd93OXS1zCivJ5r7UEAkZeJJbEX9eMWPBNg==
X-Received: by 10.25.85.200 with SMTP id j191mr3341555lfb.39.1468177090136; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 11:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.217.219 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 11:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 11:57:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1m+uS2dpQeD5minLo+U16z4FgxHnHt7_3O=z1YXrEFemw@mail.gmail.com>
To: HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11424d0ceceb7c05374c9d95"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/Qwy8huyOQ0-jZDqZl0G_63fqSN0>
Subject: [homenet] New version of homenet naming architecture...
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 18:58:14 -0000
I published a new version of my proposed homenet naming architecture document on Friday. I updated it based on extensive comments from Stuart and various other folks, but I haven't yet gone through and systematically figured out if I got everyone's comments. The draft is in the datatracker here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lemon-homenet-naming-architecture/ Diffs from -00 here: https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-lemon-homenet-naming-architecture-01.txt github: https://github.com/Abhayakara/draft-lemon-homenet-naming-architecture I made the document quite a bit more definite, since I didn't hear any strenuous objections when I presented it last time. I'd like to propose adopting the document as a working group work item. Thoughts? Do people think this is a good direction, or did the lack of objection last time indicate shocked horror rather than acquiescence?
- Re: [homenet] New version of homenet naming archi… Ted Lemon
- Re: [homenet] New version of homenet naming archi… Andrew Sullivan
- [homenet] New version of homenet naming architect… Ted Lemon