IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Homenets and MPVD

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 03 February 2015 12:00 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B30D1A8850 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 04:00:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b1B-FHWRhx2z for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 04:00:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from toccata.fugue.com (toccata.fugue.com [204.152.186.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87571A00F9 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 04:00:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.19.131.133] (unknown [12.130.116.26]) by toccata.fugue.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B08492380431; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 07:00:52 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <4193A650-550D-4CA5-B23D-06AECA4F645A@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 07:00:40 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D88EC731-65EC-4157-80CE-5C49503A499A@fugue.com>
References: <54D00ECA.1070802@gmail.com> <84ECBDCC-DAE1-4227-B7C6-27978063CB3D@darou.fr> <F7309B04-BBA5-40F0-B87F-118E3F4C2B43@iki.fi> <4193A650-550D-4CA5-B23D-06AECA4F645A@cisco.com>
To: Ole Troan <ot@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/jLPjbl4ab4Qjn6CA0neEbucmpeo>
Cc: HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>, Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>, Pierre Pfister <pierre.pfister@darou.fr>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Homenets and MPVD
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 12:00:57 -0000

On Feb 3, 2015, at 4:07 AM, Ole Troan <ot@cisco.com> wrote:
> is it actually obvious that you'd pass the PVDs to the hosts in homenets?
> PVDs contain policy. and allowing them to pass the administrative boundary into a home is also up to policy.
> given that we already have options to control DNS server selection policy. why can't the home border amalgamate that information (according to local policy)?

This is actually accounted for in the MPVD arch document.   However, that document does not contain a specific description of how to make PVDs work in a homenet--it just mentions the possibility that one might want to relay some information from the ISP intact to preserve signature information.   I think that there should be a follow-on document that explains how to do MPVD in a homenet environment and goes through the various scenarios.   What Markus described is pretty much what we had in mind.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email