Re: [hrpc] [rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org: RFC 8164 on Opportunistic Security for HTTP/2]
Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Sun, 21 May 2017 08:53 UTC
Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927FB129483 for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 May 2017 01:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z5BCpN3BkgNo for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 May 2017 01:53:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fece:1902]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2EBD129462 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Sun, 21 May 2017 01:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 86D9931D2A; Sun, 21 May 2017 10:53:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 98E77190AB6; Sun, 21 May 2017 10:48:39 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 10:48:39 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org>
Cc: hrpc@irtf.org
Message-ID: <20170521084839.GA23722@sources.org>
References: <20170516141003.ubdlqsjpnpbx6h7z@nic.fr> <c840b038-ce2e-727a-2a3f-f4d38c5cafab@article19.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <c840b038-ce2e-727a-2a3f-f4d38c5cafab@article19.org>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 8.7
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/QPzD0aSJWYTD_2L_Y-OTjWX8bkg>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] [rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org: RFC 8164 on Opportunistic Security for HTTP/2]
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "niels@article19.org" <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 08:53:12 -0000
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 04:37:01PM +0200, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org> wrote a message of 94 lines which said: > Do you have more background on why it was postponed then, and OK to > pass now? The usual discussion: if you try to "upgrade" to HTTPS, even without authentication, wouldn't it be detrimental for the effort to push for more "real" HTTPS? Also, there was the idea to have HTTP/2 out rapidly, not letting this discussion slow down the new version. It is a RFC now, but with status Experimental, only. And with mandatory authentication.
- [hrpc] [rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org: RFC 8164 on Op… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [hrpc] [rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org: RFC 8164 o… Niels ten Oever
- Re: [hrpc] [rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org: RFC 8164 o… Stephane Bortzmeyer