IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [http-state] I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-21.txt

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Fri, 18 February 2011 06:32 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-state@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238593A68DD for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:32:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.073
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.073 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.474, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d4v4dPFr9mZi for <http-state@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:32:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EFBDE3A6D46 for <http-state@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:32:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2011 06:32:37 -0000
Received: from p508F99DE.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.33]) [80.143.153.222] by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 18 Feb 2011 07:32:37 +0100
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18R/wIp6OsR+7MmsEsEgUHcS7wO37GaSFqdnzOzMh wN2uRBL8M+rS8/
Message-ID: <4D5E127C.7080508@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 07:32:28 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "http-state@ietf.org" <http-state@ietf.org>
References: <20110119231502.3778.58453.idtracker@localhost> <4D37F4EE.80700@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4D37F4EE.80700@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Subject: Re: [http-state] I-D Action:draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-21.txt
X-BeenThere: http-state@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discuss HTTP State Management Mechanism <http-state.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-state>
List-Post: <mailto:http-state@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-state>, <mailto:http-state-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 06:32:15 -0000

On 20.01.2011 09:40, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 20.01.2011 00:15, Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>> directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the HTTP State Management Mechanism
>> Working Group of the IETF.
>>
>>
>> Title : HTTP State Management Mechanism
>> Author(s) : A. Barth
>> Filename : draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-21.txt
>> Pages : 43
>> Date : 2011-01-19
>> ...
>
> Nit: there's an unused reference to RFC 5246, probably caused by a
> change in draft 20
> (<http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-20.txt>
> and
> <http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-21.txt>).
>
>
> There's also ABNF text that needs to be reformatted due to the width
> constraints...
> ...

These problems are still present in draft 22...

Also note:

   -- The draft header indicates that this document obsoletes RFC2965, 
but the
      abstract doesn't seem to mention this, which it should.

(<http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-httpstate-cookie-22.txt>)

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email