Re: [Http-well-known] Provisional and permanent entries

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 06 September 2018 06:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: http-well-known@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-well-known@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E4312F1AB for <http-well-known@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 23:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=WxcwJtqJ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=bkMj67bf
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HMzmMt01WOYQ for <http-well-known@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 23:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDE2D129C6A for <http-well-known@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Sep 2018 23:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12457215F2; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 02:16:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 06 Sep 2018 02:16:30 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=HKGNn/sUI1GoiZKeWXJmICEh51K9b wNHqmUjHUQz5Dw=; b=WxcwJtqJYwpsUMmn4wgignAIz5FjcysuWdzcIGXggybYD GQ+Q7to3TaB5Ct9uPxO16atC+wC30q7TrJXEg5vcL/hgv1+nxqBdnsKkRNvtbnFo jdTspsgLdOzUpxznwPtnKy8E55PUYyXgwZ0K3tVijqmC8UWw/DibzhY6FEHgG52k jVoILcpBBfV+MbEfRbkU3z4Vj6dYmNYz53pjTpo6pfcOJKywiEPYt1FbOzWaGZt8 vYKpbtZLMoqSGjEV9PWuiDRmzCwztOTGzWz/81YCJi9plzXq6iTfCbdwwJXqgQXD xsJw0kCnDwF/2b/RewqxxTraNDV9ZBy2ZdD2bWhHg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=HKGNn/ sUI1GoiZKeWXJmICEh51K9bwNHqmUjHUQz5Dw=; b=bkMj67bf3oXGRPkyLQw1gR cVGrGKNPyH0ibqD1IyS3gwJpzc34HkHriZvQYjA8MQEqnnMZ0pl69gper6OXjTIR sSUjyvbHUZ6G6nQh878CfWeWohFdxBVfRYua8+5VzTQUducuZSQoP83I8x9AVC7W Gpqm/nX3ecyYb6GWluliYbBCTctT5BbYk9mdNhBVcHwjMohaUHqkoJIfh2/xKfUb 0sirI3UbYhVdsbYzKISSZAtYbG99lXlM6VhxcxeKXBRvxbbbzZpOmT7wqrv0eSzR 970c7Wj0l1qNzXD9GMe0ewgewn2uyC+WbCHxvnOyNAJOLKDaRqu1ITQLm89c4OvQ ==
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:PcaQW3zjxH9gv1JObJEOP27_jG3P-eQ_mqgwSfjuXWlcOZ4QUCf-Dw> <xmx:PcaQW_bEF5QA33Oc7kI8VvvbNgWwec-X5VV-QSnh7Oj6M-LcFpw4EQ> <xmx:PcaQW5Tqrr2zWmuRYYJ3NbQxlprExHBbK-XuZkdUq-hixOcDtcP-zA> <xmx:PcaQW5yZ2eXfc4d9ACKu-keiEw4TsbrXx1aqygxj4lzUHhdJkkV1EQ> <xmx:PcaQWz2dYq_cEd3k_RXWtSz_rbDUkwoEwcTLWtfc_FS0XzjCcAA7GA> <xmx:PsaQW2Zo4z91OWMptV00N3LqHdrpQYmbqyKLiFd4LEqdipjIv8SEdg>
X-ME-Sender: <xms:PcaQWzv1Glu1TQQl6E0LKkmE3KhJXbvHT-G7vFSH71Rk9QW-V_Pr2g>
Received: from attitudadjuster.mnot.net (unknown [144.136.175.28]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 20A3110292; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 02:16:27 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <c065f67f-0de1-57c5-a080-abd03c79343f@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 16:16:25 +1000
Cc: http-well-known@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AC964FD7-3ED3-4AE7-A6E6-77E2975815C1@mnot.net>
References: <A3CA781C-E6C9-458B-8EDF-9D88FB0D6030@mnot.net> <c065f67f-0de1-57c5-a080-abd03c79343f@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
To: =?utf-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3Qi?= <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/http-well-known/SG4eQSulyqyP4MXXOgwEJqk1EQU>
Subject: Re: [Http-well-known] Provisional and permanent entries
X-BeenThere: http-well-known@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of HTTP Well-Known URIs <http-well-known.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/http-well-known>, <mailto:http-well-known-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/http-well-known/>
List-Post: <mailto:http-well-known@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-well-known-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-well-known>, <mailto:http-well-known-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 06:16:33 -0000

Fixed in source, thanks!


> On 6 Sep 2018, at 3:48 pm, Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>; wrote:
> 
> Hello Mark,
> 
> On 2018/09/06 08:38, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> After the earlier discussion with Martin, and some off-list discussion, I've tentatively added a "status" field to the registry. Text currently is:
>> Status:
>> : One of "permanent" or "provisional". See guidance below.
>> [...]
>> Standards-defined values have a status of "permanent". Other values can also be registered as permanent, if the Experts find that they are in use, in consultation with the community. Other values should be registered as "provisional".
>> Provisional entries can be removed from the Experts if -- in consultation with the community -- find that they are not in use. The Experts can change a provisional entry's status to permanent at any time.
> 
> Just some editorial fixes:
> 
> "Provisional entries can be removed from the Experts if"
> -> "Provisional entries can be removed by the Experts if"
> 
> 
> "-- in consultation with the community -- find that they are not in use."
> -> "-- in consultation with the community -- the Experts find that they are not in use."
> 
> Regards,   Martin.
> 
>> [...]
>> Upon publication, IANA should:
>> * Update the status of all existing registrations to "permanent".
>> Are people comfortable with this?
>> 
> 
> Except for the details, no problem at all.
> 
> Regards,   Martin.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Http-well-known mailing list
> Http-well-known@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-well-known

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/