IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Design Issue: Frame Size Items

"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Wed, 08 May 2013 06:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8965A21F8F0D for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 23:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6BOFr7uVBlqQ for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2013 23:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E50D21F8956 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2013 23:36:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UZxy2-00041f-F1 for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 08 May 2013 06:35:10 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 06:35:10 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UZxy2-00041f-F1@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>) id 1UZxxq-0002lc-MI for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 08 May 2013 06:34:58 +0000
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk ([130.225.244.222]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>) id 1UZxxq-0003zE-3P for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 08 May 2013 06:34:58 +0000
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.61.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184F889FBE; Wed, 8 May 2013 06:34:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r486YaDj007500; Wed, 8 May 2013 06:34:36 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
cc: "William Chan (陈智昌)" <willchan@chromium.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In-reply-to: <CABP7Rbe+N+JEesvsV4EeQnc-7YSyiUmp2_46cD7znAA9OcNTZQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
References: <CABP7RbcUDvmYjUjE703UTgOcYTSLBohR7EFw2Rb9u-EDkB7htg@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYgwggq4FNweDCEfbsp-fN3yJ8p35jx=fK8Xc5adk+fUVg@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVvhxw_h1QEM3U=pRwKFdZ5GudEiz+UwNf99M5vjMvVLQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYgKnYhgvArS7FSWqRSf4MfhRbymCiGOC3E21E6R32KWCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7Rbe+N+JEesvsV4EeQnc-7YSyiUmp2_46cD7znAA9OcNTZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 06:34:36 +0000
Message-ID: <7499.1367994876@critter.freebsd.dk>
Received-SPF: none client-ip=130.225.244.222; envelope-from=phk@phk.freebsd.dk; helo=phk.freebsd.dk
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.782, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.324
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UZxxq-0003zE-3P 5beb23cc06cc09baaabd3074a9d09d41
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Design Issue: Frame Size Items
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/7499.1367994876@critter.freebsd.dk>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17889
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

In message <CABP7Rbe+N+JEesvsV4EeQnc-7YSyiUmp2_46cD7znAA9OcNTZQ@mail.gmail.com>
, James M Snell writes:

>Proposal: Let's define that 8192+8 is the default MAX_FRAME size. 

8192 is a pretty arbitrary choice, wouldn't it make sense to do a
bit of math on typical MTU's and TCP/IP header sizes and see if
any numbers work out more optimal ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email