IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: HTTP/2 GREASE, Results, and Implications

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Thu, 31 October 2019 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E7412010F for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:13:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GURm8BcEYFJA for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D426812006A for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:13:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1iQEuH-0007dh-6Q for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:10:49 +0000
Resent-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:10:49 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1iQEuH-0007dh-6Q@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4c]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1iQEuF-0007cs-Cw for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:10:47 +0000
Received: from mail-vk1-xa33.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::a33]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>) id 1iQEuD-0004so-VW for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:10:47 +0000
Received: by mail-vk1-xa33.google.com with SMTP id 70so1603325vkz.8 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2IRYZhTNGEqnIlVafwcaIR3yjsc9fYsdonDLK6noZw4=; b=Ezv463zB7ZIgZlGr8b8tYT0emH1IWeqLs8u/i/5Q8CRh3JbjN620FYFGoDIcBLDZ/z Zl/fu4fjic0AyHRPnQZm7W5Wp88st0bRnc8BlogqtD64gN9Jj0lKim9IExuzY8dSqlk5 gqYZo8QQ+u6AbH/45O2/p4ymaVnpudPXYNBCJ56lrFDxCT3YNh9QewLR12xYXXeZUi22 VVNvwKNKojVvu0AzS8FEWwuaOPqZybh88h0dq+4L1IDzNnV3tILMdWyQOF7ZSJK1+nfc sjvTgUt2XReOXfPzhvllloNMt5R72Sq61c3YAfZwKzb1OjS45/YJXExSl8DC/2sFlCud TyKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2IRYZhTNGEqnIlVafwcaIR3yjsc9fYsdonDLK6noZw4=; b=Sjp6YHDPZbRS5lh3bHfprDfbqdqmNOK+3eimzOs9WsG6d7BX4gjkz+myhTow0PWnGI gpo8zrbFL0WQVnuqkWETTQ1Axb0IK2d0N+gvuB3F8iYaEGNHgjLa3uq/f6alkJ1RyRET MNqs9c93aENdBqAZzHR+iAdKMNCSE/rNVpJyPk5qM4cu7qSDVhcYMHmukTqvs+Gfi7zc 2QG9uLwJo1CWDi3kb+OFt3BITaLV5F1hZIyVZDOVB8ghYNtkMRGSPHZBt/WTz9J+WHKw Cklg1YePMhWU7eCcQfT9lrE58WfXEkdGFh8WooOBOm0XTatKpk85uxszfdjZr9F7r0Cu WrRA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXFYaYvbogM5UsrsA0Yv0ITCATmCOTGlRtckFYWeo7s3UDgPOSh OZ+aYlnuNILaUthoYdfhWlKx32BtJOsiPEW6XNs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxDQwT+Nkkmyg6iwqVPkQrE39j2WRtx9H1WeTCS7y5WFlJy3YW9EjG7xwLGMXumKC3a6/l9wPdvu6QXO81QAGk=
X-Received: by 2002:ac5:cdee:: with SMTP id v14mr3331680vkn.15.1572545444908; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BN6PR2201MB1700D10A34C72213C78E09A6DA630@BN6PR2201MB1700.namprd22.prod.outlook.com> <CALGR9oZUHDbsvWUJ=r0TBDaKOwchWux5gEF+EH0cpb6hqcs-xA@mail.gmail.com> <BN6PR2201MB1700996BA38EC2FED189E876DA630@BN6PR2201MB1700.namprd22.prod.outlook.com> <BN6PR2201MB1700DA200AA4C756558170A6DA630@BN6PR2201MB1700.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR2201MB1700DA200AA4C756558170A6DA630@BN6PR2201MB1700.namprd22.prod.outlook.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 18:10:33 +0000
Message-ID: <CALGR9oY033EM9hgxOFeWZ8=1S-N662dm7u-P-5RCwWBZakT-xw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a31193059638c4c4"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::a33; envelope-from=lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com; helo=mail-vk1-xa33.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1iQEuD-0004so-VW b3b5651673aa28930dc0d9a3ca33b2ef
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: HTTP/2 GREASE, Results, and Implications
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CALGR9oY033EM9hgxOFeWZ8=1S-N662dm7u-P-5RCwWBZakT-xw@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/37091
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 5:49 PM Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be> wrote:

> Upon further investigation, it appears that Akamai hosts most of the sites
> where the connection gets closed, and Cloudflare hosts the sites which
> close the stream but leave the connection open (I’m guessing, from what the
> dev tools show).  Given that we’re both represented here, it seems likely
> that we should be able to drive some internal bugfixes and improve the
> state of the ecosystem.
>

It's possible the Cloudflare closures are related to the client-oriented
half-closed issue that Willy and Bence have discussed. We'd be happy to
coordinate with other members of the group on a rerun of the experiment in
order to come to a more definitive answer.

Lucas



>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email