Re: http/2 initial limits - i see flow control initial limits specified, but not stream limits

James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Fri, 03 May 2013 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021C021F9738 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 May 2013 11:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.05
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.05 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.249, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yt2tJp8knnBR for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 May 2013 11:06:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858B821F9739 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 3 May 2013 11:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UYKMZ-000675-NH for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 18:05:43 +0000
Resent-Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 18:05:43 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UYKMZ-000675-NH@frink.w3.org>
Received: from maggie.w3.org ([128.30.52.39]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1UYKMQ-00061c-3r for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 18:05:34 +0000
Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com ([209.85.214.182]) by maggie.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <jasnell@gmail.com>) id 1UYKMP-00050S-84 for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 18:05:34 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id eh20so1666753obb.13 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Fri, 03 May 2013 11:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KsJJsgtZynjljQcqCdXK1SWeO0nsUy6b/0cndyAwk5g=; b=wNngk6/ICnn05A9XIPPna7Wbh26QtW14BwAyRU7n3K4czK+iq+lVlOmQWHjC4r/YE1 Zh5J8gasicHeNXAC3X2RCD1Xt51UVxbuBZdjtilNdzRHSrjqZH4L2T7GbOtEc0rGkY6u FSoLEhgOA0qUOhjOqfj0S7gDendSBrF7WOIDl12GkafjBTBWXq0n5JnuuqnIy3InFHn3 hN2/4Jo8vrRkwEffYnLdQbsuCjYmWCUvyKl1vsjGq8sWSytB3gxNKYXBh6kjaId/6PEr k4EXb5MQOXx14s+TFC31GvThrxhRgkQ5yg2lpm2G0cGv4sNISNPdeYmmAkYSwYu3JQWS lzdQ==
X-Received: by 10.60.16.69 with SMTP id e5mr512768oed.46.1367604307391; Fri, 03 May 2013 11:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.3.137 with HTTP; Fri, 3 May 2013 11:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAA4WUYg_zRcyU1Qju+MA_4YT3FJB4PVAWi+iVkqi=9uvAo84YA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA4WUYjnMupHPL8i13qzNTYr4dDjc_-ygZABaM1C6c8zUuMGJQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABP7RbfxGehBXw+114wyaKJaTQV1rLqCiZXq6KERWbO_HRRpBg@mail.gmail.com> <CAA4WUYg_zRcyU1Qju+MA_4YT3FJB4PVAWi+iVkqi=9uvAo84YA@mail.gmail.com>
From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 11:04:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CABP7RbdCWOQZRSmqTtc_X7qKnRi=vRBpQDH3PaZE42ZQbg--Jw@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?V2lsbGlhbSBDaGFuICjpmYjmmbrmmIwp?= <willchan@chromium.org>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=209.85.214.182; envelope-from=jasnell@gmail.com; helo=mail-ob0-f182.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-2.689, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: maggie.w3.org 1UYKMP-00050S-84 6b72fefdbe20b7ab20ad6c9d480f0971
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: http/2 initial limits - i see flow control initial limits specified, but not stream limits
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CABP7RbdCWOQZRSmqTtc_X7qKnRi=vRBpQDH3PaZE42ZQbg--Jw@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/17807
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Currently in the trunk:

    indicates the maximum number of concurrent streams that the sender
will allow.
    This limit is directional: it applies to the number
    of streams that the sender permits the receiver to create. By
default there is no
    limit.  It is recommended that this value be no smaller than 100,
    so as to not unnecessarily limit parallelism.



On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:52 AM, William Chan (陈智昌)
<willchan@chromium.org>; wrote:
> The setting is there, but I don't see the initial limit, which I believe was
> 100.
>
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 2:47 PM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>; wrote:
>>
>> Which limits specifically? SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS is still
>> there. Are there others you're concerned about?
>>
>> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:37 AM, William Chan (陈智昌)
>> <willchan@chromium.org>; wrote:
>> > Did the stream limits disappear by accident?
>
>