Re: #467: Expect: 100-continue and "final" status codes

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 29 May 2013 06:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B6F21F8700 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2013 23:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.266
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.333, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6YhHrGMDm45x for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2013 23:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2068D21F8F1E for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 28 May 2013 23:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1UhZld-00034j-Bu for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 06:21:49 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 06:21:49 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1UhZld-00034j-Bu@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1UhZlM-00033L-6g for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 06:21:32 +0000
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net ([216.86.168.182]) by lisa.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mnot@mnot.net>) id 1UhZlK-0007TK-LA for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 06:21:32 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.80] (unknown [118.209.184.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F90D22E1FA; Wed, 29 May 2013 02:21:06 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <20130529051515.GA6426@1wt.eu>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 16:21:02 +1000
Cc: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>, Zhong Yu <zhong.j.yu@gmail.com>, Ken Murchison <murch@andrew.cmu.edu>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6D6D8B2E-8BAC-4BEE-9AAA-D306F81EB745@mnot.net>
References: <CACuKZqGmrDiNQvG0SVw=XXcy_n-BBxK-pnp+ar7uAbnwkumRag@mail.gmail.com> <51780FBA.3080706@andrew.cmu.edu> <20130424170638.GD19750@1wt.eu> <1CD0C86A-CFBF-4DF6-A688-9E4EF549190E@mnot.net> <CACuKZqGwm+aH+jRSNmKsfdDwe3eCVhmtr=u0rbUFC2+G99T5VQ@mail.gmail.com> <9C460363-84A8-459E-A9F1-B6A1219F31D7@mnot.net> <CACuKZqEfKFhCyDqeq_HpMfoG==jcx7xGifd=+qbUqErTZvBLjQ@mail.gmail.com> <A92880B4-EFDC-4695-B759-9A48959A2A67@apple.com> <20130529051515.GA6426@1wt.eu>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.86.168.182; envelope-from=mnot@mnot.net; helo=mxout-07.mxes.net
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.399, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1UhZlK-0007TK-LA 82f498887030bd00b6d8aecd9a458542
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: #467: Expect: 100-continue and "final" status codes
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/6D6D8B2E-8BAC-4BEE-9AAA-D306F81EB745@mnot.net>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18141
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

It sounds like we've got agreement on this. I'm marking the issue for incorporation with the (modified) suggested text.

Cheers and thanks,


On 29/05/2013, at 3:15 PM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>; wrote:

> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:04:16PM -0400, Michael Sweet wrote:
>> You'll still find many embedded HTTP servers that do not honor the Expect
>> header.  CUPS has explicit timeout code on the client side for this since it
>> affects (far too) many IPP printers... :(
> 
> Not to mention transparent 1.0 proxies which want to analyse the payload
> before passing the request.
> 
> Regards,
> Willy
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/