IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Status code 422 in http-core uses the term `entity`. Should we use `representation` ?

Roberto Polli <roberto@teamdigitale.governo.it> Wed, 15 May 2019 08:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request+bounce-httpbisa-archive-bis2juki=lists.ie@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD4F120191 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2019 01:36:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=teamdigitale.governo.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b9TmkL3k8nSQ for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2019 01:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [IPv6:2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0E5F120020 for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2019 01:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1hQpMF-0007X6-IC for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 08:33:51 +0000
Resent-Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 08:33:51 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1hQpMF-0007X6-IC@frink.w3.org>
Received: from titan.w3.org ([2603:400a:ffff:804:801e:34:0:4c]) by frink.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <roberto@teamdigitale.governo.it>) id 1hQpMC-0007Vs-6G for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 08:33:48 +0000
Received: from mail-ed1-x529.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::529]) by titan.w3.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <roberto@teamdigitale.governo.it>) id 1hQpM9-0000oP-Og for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Wed, 15 May 2019 08:33:48 +0000
Received: by mail-ed1-x529.google.com with SMTP id b8so2921444edm.11 for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Wed, 15 May 2019 01:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=teamdigitale.governo.it; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8hwKgljgE1Le9Lp4zD5Z5Gc9caekBzJdFRiG5eNIUcY=; b=mUdVB1VnXn39GKsUwoyDRYywdoMsN2oIGKmt0tlULNEEwkdteqQo5tAdX7j+ioVD6R KVY+9nzbACEiK8dk+RM69dE23xtnmEVXkgl+A1JW4LZiOzLRnEBrA93nLy4asdDB1vdW zj2XYL6SWpVYV/FTYeW5FH9NyvqPMSC8oV7thyqp+wFcPYNGrxIHgPFNapQyUIycoUQ1 mUCkZfKcr+EoUnZgvK2lge7zbocNSZo/egLQaOAY8aPH9gjPGUG1tV8ScERQd4LKB5Va KE3wv2BOiMKdFPPyQLjY+btNqJY5OBPNAgrVdDDFUdiBW69M1qLpvg6E2UGlUcqmUzyI jLEw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8hwKgljgE1Le9Lp4zD5Z5Gc9caekBzJdFRiG5eNIUcY=; b=DEhsck1zEEg8DPi/7KeRg9v8rqarcfo1dsmRX8pRs/0UQE0cP856mTqf67Qg3/KQ+h HJKYNE++8n46KjZHNdUeA9GlS+H6tuXg2w0MQ+kIthh9C8b6roTai7Ts6tcymejnedd5 X83c/v8rPd624MlBdUHekHkaZv7FFF0LC5Dsx4GxnDcoc+RZNwZX5X4YVUeRFFOYqaGI xBPLokxgAHIXYb8EUxMmJZ9dT3waQCveKxXvRgv1bB7B/1h+514yznFCtoYf3PPxigfM uRfntUrk+BRmJ6454tq4jVz9a3U60zR2IJA3LEWrq9E+QUMRrg82ByED8vKDyCzQsigC 5FQg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXGagrM5k0t/WVZLSn8I04nbloJMBItl73Q1Y8cYN+PjzRlU0sR 0eLvmw59zoyiideXQdaOT6Wr9hNzeeZQICuk2I4jWGd8tWPx1g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyQhcv/O/687FkNzy0sP17M3ivuNPF0Jdqi5thLo4ztLEUF8oon/l9gCzrPx0JHeLr2wn6T9c+mKLuF+Kl1JK0=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:addc:: with SMTP id b28mr42822807edd.7.1557909199061; Wed, 15 May 2019 01:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMRHeuyKsYvHYz-x=WqO_iJ6hCehnvkeO6XeEtda7msCvC30Fw@mail.gmail.com> <01d4f67f-a65e-a2d6-86d2-435969544485@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <01d4f67f-a65e-a2d6-86d2-435969544485@gmx.de>
From: Roberto Polli <roberto@teamdigitale.governo.it>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 10:33:07 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMRHeuxd+=UBG-jA9xMqCGSSi+3uPsQj7T2+bUupqHutUQsnMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::529; envelope-from=roberto@teamdigitale.governo.it; helo=mail-ed1-x529.google.com
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=2.683, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, W3C_AA=-1, W3C_WL=-1
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: titan.w3.org 1hQpM9-0000oP-Og 4182381bf6a063033b66788db2e7eec3
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Status code 422 in http-core uses the term `entity`. Should we use `representation` ?
Archived-At: <https://www.w3.org/mid/CAMRHeuxd+=UBG-jA9xMqCGSSi+3uPsQj7T2+bUupqHutUQsnMw@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/36646
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <https://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi J,


Il giorno mer 15 mag 2019 alle ore 08:41 Julian Reschke
<julian.reschke@gmx.de> ha scritto:
> > - https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/224
> > - it should use the term `representation`
> "enclosed representation"
Ok, I'm following the thread on gh.

> > - the definition should expand the original statements which are tied to webdav
> >    so that it could be more generic
> Please be more specific.

Your PR https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/pull/226
clarifies, so it's ok

> > - we could add one or two examples with the correct 422 usage
> I'm not against examples, but we currently have none in this section.
> Adding just a few for 422 would be weird.
Ok!

Thanks++,
R.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email