Re: #473, was: p7: forwarding Proxy-*

Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> Mon, 29 July 2013 20:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F7D21E80B7 for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A+4MWJhlSKUD for <ietfarch-httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frink.w3.org (frink.w3.org [128.30.52.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D82D21E80AD for <httpbisa-archive-bis2Juki@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists by frink.w3.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <ietf-http-wg-request@listhub.w3.org>) id 1V3uAx-0004dA-9A for ietf-http-wg-dist@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 20:36:15 +0000
Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 20:36:15 +0000
Resent-Message-Id: <E1V3uAx-0004dA-9A@frink.w3.org>
Received: from lisa.w3.org ([128.30.52.41]) by frink.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1V3uAo-0004bl-Hg for ietf-http-wg@listhub.w3.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 20:36:06 +0000
Received: from ip-58-28-153-233.static-xdsl.xnet.co.nz ([58.28.153.233] helo=treenet.co.nz) by lisa.w3.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <squid3@treenet.co.nz>) id 1V3uAh-0005Uq-0p for ietf-http-wg@w3.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 20:36:06 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.218] (ip202-27-218-168.satlan.co.nz [202.27.218.168]) by treenet.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA44E6F7A for <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:35:28 +1200 (NZST)
Message-ID: <51F6D20F.5090200@treenet.co.nz>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:35:27 +1200
From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
References: <76583F5C-A175-42EA-B0A0-CB5663A5E3AC@mnot.net> <9E71BAB0-0D88-4B6E-B1A1-AA228349E3CA@gbiv.com> <27ED39F0-723C-4358-9A22-4AAEEC1BA912@mnot.net> <37ABC670-148B-4D7A-AE21-6692EFFC122F@gbiv.com> <3257D0DA-F6FA-4E24-919C-C4FB4864F69E@mnot.net> <51F4FB7F.3050807@gmx.de> <D9E38713-A86F-47BE-9124-D4EA88700BD3@mnot.net> <51F66E8D.1090109@gmx.de> <120946A4-C088-41B9-836E-50A59A1D5941@mnot.net> <51F67241.3090004@gmx.de> <51F67D4E.2020308@gmx.de> <D595AD08-B370-4B8A-9A41-609F63AE8BA3@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <D595AD08-B370-4B8A-9A41-609F63AE8BA3@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=58.28.153.233; envelope-from=squid3@treenet.co.nz; helo=treenet.co.nz
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5
X-W3C-Hub-Spam-Report: AWL=-3.449, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001
X-W3C-Scan-Sig: lisa.w3.org 1V3uAh-0005Uq-0p 6b2959b211fa66cc2c6529a3d3a81cd4
X-Original-To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: #473, was: p7: forwarding Proxy-*
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/51F6D20F.5090200@treenet.co.nz>
Resent-From: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
X-Mailing-List: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> archive/latest/18963
X-Loop: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Resent-Sender: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf-http-wg.w3.org>
List-Help: <http://www.w3.org/Mail/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 30/07/2013 2:49 a.m., Mark Nottingham wrote:
> /me re-reads; yep, looks good.
>
> Thanks,
>

Ditto. +1.

Amos

> On Jul 29, 2013, at 4:33 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>; wrote:
>
> Proposed patch for Proxy-Authenticate: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/473/473.diff>
>
> Looking at Proxy-Authorization:
>
> "Unlike Authorization, the Proxy-Authorization header field applies only to the next outbound proxy that demanded authentication using the Proxy-Authenticate field. When multiple proxies are used in a chain, the Proxy-Authorization header field is consumed by the first outbound proxy that was expecting to receive credentials. A proxy MAY relay the credentials from the client request to the next proxy if that is the mechanism by which the proxies cooperatively authenticate a given request."
>
> ...which seems to be correct already, right?
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>