Re: [I2nsf] WG Adoption call for I2NSF Registration Interface Data Model Draft

" 김진용 " <wlsdyd0930@nate.com> Fri, 14 September 2018 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <wlsdyd0930@nate.com>
X-Original-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127781294D7 for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 13:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.43
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.43 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG=0.377, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h3LxzwlmxNqn for <i2nsf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 13:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailtx3.nate.com (mailtx3.nate.com [117.53.114.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B0D1130E1F for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2018 13:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.234.214.41] ([10.234.214.41]) by mailtx3.nate.com ([10.234.214.16]) with ESMTP id 1536956275.353300.3534748528.mailtx3 for <i2nsf@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Sep 2018 05:17:55 +0900 (KST)
Message-Id: <b151367f798f9095c726ee876d551943$8c6e4d4f@mail3.nate.com>
From: 김진용 <wlsdyd0930@nate.com>
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org, jaehoon.paul@gmail.com, ynir.ietf@gmail.com, skku_secu-brain_all@googlegroups.com
X-TERRACE-DUMMYSUBJECT: Terrace Spam system *
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2018 05:17:53 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Nate MIME interface v1.0
X-MailerKey: MTE1LjE0NS4xNzguMTc2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Nate-Key: b151367f798f9095c726ee876d551943$8c6e4d4f@mail3.nate.com
X-TERRACE-SPAMMARK: NO (SR:47.30) (by Terrace)
X-TERRACE-PEERIP: 10.234.214.41
X-TERRACE-CLASSID: type=NO,str=0001.0A150202.5B9C1773.0052,ss=1,re=0.000,rec
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/gUkVboIGQ81JcYsmTHJmpJfdSHk>
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] WG Adoption call for I2NSF Registration Interface Data Model Draft
X-BeenThere: i2nsf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*I2NSF: Interface to Network Security Functions mailing list*" <i2nsf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2nsf/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2nsf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf>, <mailto:i2nsf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 20:18:02 -0000

 Hi,
 
I think "draft-hyun-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm-06" is necessary for the I2NSF framework.
 
So, I support it.
 
Thank you.
 
Best regards,
 
- Jinyong (Tim) Kim -
------ Original Message ------

Date: Wednesday, Sep 12, 2018 05:56:15 AM
From: "Linda Dunbar" <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
To: "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>, "i2nsf@ietf.org" <i2nsf@ietf.org>
Cc: "SecCurator_Team" <skku_secu-brain_all@googlegroups.com>, "Yoav Nir" <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: [I2nsf] WG Adoption call for I2NSF Registration Interface Data Model Draft

I2NSF WG,

 

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hyun-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm-06" rel="nofollow">https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hyun-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm-06  represents one of the 3 interfaces identified by the i2nsf framework RFC8329. The authors have merged both Information model and the data model into one document.

 

The WG Chairs have determined that it makes sense to go for a WG adoption call on this document.

We are allowing 3 weeks for these calls, ending Oct 3.

 

Please respond with either support or objection to the WG adopting this document.

 

Please be aware adopting to WG only means that WG agrees it is a good direction to go, meaning it is now at WG’s hand to make the needed changes (instead of authors themselves. )

 

Thank you very much

 

Linda & Yoav

 

From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong [mailto:jaehoon.paul@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 11:25 AM
To: i2nsf@ietf.org
Cc: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>; Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>; SecCurator_Team <skku_secu-brain_all@googlegroups.com>; Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
Subject: Request for WG Adoption on I2NSF Registration Interface Data Model Draft

 

Hi Linda and Yoav,

As we agreed on the merging of Information Model and Data Model Drafts

of I2NSF Registration Interface in the last IETF-102 Montreal Meeting, 

our authors have merged these two drafts into one draft as below:

 

- I2NSF Registration Interface Data Model

  (draft-hyun-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm-06)

 

Could you start the WG adoption call?

 

Thanks.

 

Best Regards,

Paul

-- 

===========================
Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Department of Software
Sungkyunkwan University
Office: &#-3;82-31-299-4957
Email: jaehoon.paul@gmail.compauljeong@skku.edu
Personal Homepage: http://cpslab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"> http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php

https://mail3.nate.com/app/msg/confirm/?usn=18850962&email=wlsdyd0930@nate.com&key=b151367f798f9095c726ee876d551943$8c6e4d4f@mail3.nate.com" height="1" width="1">