[i2rs] Solicit for comments for drafts related with fabric service model and fabric topology model
顾 戎 <gurong_cmcc@outlook.com> Mon, 27 March 2017 06:08 UTC
Return-Path: <gurong_cmcc@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7139E126C7A for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 23:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wQawBOTQ_uHX for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 23:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from APC01-HK2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092255083.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.255.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAF711241FC for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 23:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=PUhbADLR8PAxoXF2L+O1pwo+oxd3qouan7dAk/eFzm8=; b=A3y+dFsk0KTkhjUBU8ygGXG+ewJByeK9VdaA6pT9d+9TkoXWN8TTc6djQDYnn1Cp/nr+FKrRkFeOVCTvVr38FF/RjHzUpD4HDbKJzeiIDsBKR8YPsSgPbKZLMuyhDU5JiTpeHAbW8nhz5FXt6Dgys2mZMGIpU1Xcmgfve/5a6XlfFbJ5I4R3udXbus9CS27Ev2AIcgGqfM+BjssvK43jpw/Qvw7mLQ2WUIISjzly+6r5SDWTDQSqr9TLqkiyr9nKehLug+ZGf+dvdwc6xkcfQ1jqZGEZj9acFvxeYKZGxYm92l6hegMOepKvK3mmieVZrek/ECo5TMya/Hoj4Gbi/A==
Received: from SG2APC01FT057.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.250.60) by SG2APC01HT116.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.250.255) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.977.7; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 06:08:41 +0000
Received: from HKXPR02MB0517.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.152.250.57) by SG2APC01FT057.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.251.133) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.977.7 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 06:08:40 +0000
Received: from HKXPR02MB0517.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c972:916d:ed83:7d85]) by HKXPR02MB0517.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c972:916d:ed83:7d85%13]) with mapi id 15.01.0991.020; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 06:08:41 +0000
From: 顾 戎 <gurong_cmcc@outlook.com>
To: "i2rs@ietf.org" <i2rs@ietf.org>
CC: "susaha1@mail.regent.edu" <susaha1@mail.regent.edu>, "zhuangyan.zhuang@huawei.com" <zhuangyan.zhuang@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: Solicit for comments for drafts related with fabric service model and fabric topology model
Thread-Index: AQHSpsCIyvLH55d8zkmVyvECeuH3tQ==
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 06:08:41 +0000
Message-ID: <HKXPR02MB0517F7DD661E5C3BFB7826868B330@HKXPR02MB0517.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: mail.regent.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;mail.regent.edu; dmarc=none action=none header.from=outlook.com;
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:FF26D2DC631FC17307BB61352889F4A02DFBF3D0CEF1C2D5AC5F0787A77EA4E8; UpperCasedChecksum:13976E76C88615EF95C01A356CC87053F33347A6034B2C20B68B2DB838A5CF1F; SizeAsReceived:8130; Count:40
x-tmn: [K9f6kAFC4TP9JgjeG0RGiLlVmsAwTBsc]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SG2APC01HT116; 5:Wx4e+OrlOXKJXXi6o5GMjpFoA76KhahtwFHXKKknUGQTmA7fhZXan84kq30KhF8iLjXhnGsHwM9Exwj9GZbOlyaCnfzi4z2GuC/da+2Tw2MuHrBnrSXnCu5MKCM+gGVBUtuRZp/NINkgoOmRctFLxQ==; 24:3vGjsGExf3RUSC/ORJsoX5CM3ZcrY666uUZDFe/gxcFKorDsuxGNs4Egb2Xc26r2N8vlPo/Pp699tNm3tnbI6nSLANVAB+sOMPJVwbENBiQ=; 7:3CMo5lqUKUgRThnR8/D13fxigRz3K/YwERNog7sN6Y/BwLd9mZ4xyCzrxvQSwKCmYizSfTNfqnSo8bRocdTFA/QPuKuqgjzakE89dnECuMYJyOr7csoHGXPCBMtwHief3ogPdat9eDkveyPec4gTHK+CmRTeCh7vyxIXtLMWbSP4n3k0j2GZlmF+fxjG+jG8D+sGVDsxMbKHgwwW68FakIV0ogHfuEtQCy3no4c83QbNbT/260gc9cSv+0ghZZULz4v8gi+6lxiOuGyOER+i7FK9wVDcp/O25qKOpGBQ40+QGXm9otoNCK+ECMc13kbT
x-incomingheadercount: 40
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:SG2APC01HT116; H:HKXPR02MB0517.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 143fa7a2-bc3a-4730-d604-08d474d7b788
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(201702061074)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031322274)(1601125374)(1603101448)(1701031045); SRVR:SG2APC01HT116;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444000031); SRVR:SG2APC01HT116; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SG2APC01HT116;
x-forefront-prvs: 02596AB7DA
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_HKXPR02MB0517F7DD661E5C3BFB7826868B330HKXPR02MB0517apcp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Mar 2017 06:08:41.1133 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SG2APC01HT116
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/RE0DFloWoQREIIBAO2pHumVd6_g>
Subject: [i2rs] Solicit for comments for drafts related with fabric service model and fabric topology model
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 06:08:47 -0000
Hi, dear all. We have updated two drafts related with the DC fabic recently. The first is about service model which is used by the orchestration in order to get the service information from users. In the updated version, we modified the usage architecture for the easy understanding. Besides we think it's different from topology models from TEAS. Teas pay attention on the traffic engineering rather than DC deployment, while fabric model is focused on DC network with its details such as spine-leaf architecture and switches and routers deployment. The second is about fabric topology model which is the topology information in DC fabric. We delete the RPC parts in consideration of security. Fabric service model and fabric topology model faces to different levels of network. By combining these two, we can get the DC network deployment much easier. Here are the links of these two drafts. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-zhuang-i2rs-dc-fabric-service-model https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-zhuang-i2rs-yang-dc-fabric-network-topology Any comments are welcomed. Best regards. Gu Rong gurong_cmcc@outlook.com gurong@chinamobile.com