Re: [Ianaplan] CWG proposal up for public comment

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Fri, 24 April 2015 18:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249981ACD7D for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0twbmFGlhHVz for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (mx2.yitter.info [50.116.54.116]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7589D1ACD6E for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03572106B0; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:05:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx2.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Otw6cnuwoTp; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:05:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (c-50-169-68-91.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [50.169.68.91]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0AB301063A; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:05:37 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:05:35 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: Jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com>
Message-ID: <20150424180535.GI709@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <20150423133805.GB17594@mx2.yitter.info> <20150424135242.192501B2FE2@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAD_dc6hURbLC46-1QMPKKJ_PnhJOoa2o86pc8m9M4JG6jc2_PQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150423133805.GB17594@mx2.yitter.info> <20150424135245.58AED106B0@mx2.yitter.info> <20150424140831.GF709@mx2.yitter.info> <20150424154818.BB6BD106B2@mx2.yitter.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150424154818.BB6BD106B2@mx2.yitter.info>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/IPrcv0NbIqf3q6sRNzRg8ziOQXs>
Cc: ianaplan@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] CWG proposal up for public comment
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:05:40 -0000

Hi,
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 05:48:10PM +0200, Jefsey wrote:

> considered necessary to address. What I consider as increasingly disturbing
> and whish to see approched in the best manner  (I try to adopt a median
> position acceptable to most) in my IAB appeal.

You have not, unless I have overlooked something important, actually
yet filed an appeal with the IAB.  Right?  That is, you have stated an
intention to appeal, but haven't filed it.  (You talk of "my IAB
appeal", but I presume that you just elided the "forthcoming" or
something like that.)  If you believe you have filed your appeal,
please let me know immediately, because if so I haven't seen it.

(I won't comment futher as you seem to be suggesting your argument is
germaine to an appeal you intend to file, and I don't want to disturb
that discussion.)

Best regards,

Andrew 

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com