Re: [Ianaplan] NTIA found that IANA proposal meets the criteria

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Fri, 10 June 2016 04:51 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457DA12DA9F for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 21:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3lAe-H82RcCa for <ianaplan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 21:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C5412DA61 for <ianaplan@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jun 2016 21:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685E12CC9C; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 07:51:09 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rmP7q0N0LpFM; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 07:51:08 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F092CC64; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 07:51:08 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C596C9E2-9BDF-47D1-94DB-4C049E238483"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <6678922F-5A02-4C81-84A3-74BD42CD3DDC@viagenie.ca>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 06:51:08 +0200
Message-Id: <A90353C3-21A5-4DBF-9F69-61BC435C2972@piuha.net>
References: <6678922F-5A02-4C81-84A3-74BD42CD3DDC@viagenie.ca>
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ianaplan/hsiZABMpb2YOnG6VtQI0P46zWu0>
Cc: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] NTIA found that IANA proposal meets the criteria
X-BeenThere: ianaplan@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA Plan <ianaplan.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ianaplan/>
List-Post: <mailto:ianaplan@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan>, <mailto:ianaplan-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 04:51:12 -0000

This is good.

For your information, this is a brief comment that Andrew and I wrote yesterday:

https://www.ietf.org/blog/2016/06/ntia-assessment-of-the-iana-stewardship-transition-proposal/

Jari