IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Iasa20] draft-ietf-iasa2-consolidated-upd-06

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Fri, 08 March 2019 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B027124B16 for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 08:08:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=mHbnIp6U; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=VjB8REzJ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l1dSVv_Bs8kp for <iasa20@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 08:08:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26F8D120106 for <iasa20@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 08:08:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6E521D35; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 11:08:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 08 Mar 2019 11:08:31 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=Z oBUhrIj07zBRcpPnUX93QtGzQdVrt/vG/bMFB2rOjQ=; b=mHbnIp6UI595BPPuH LRfMDxeaXdubcLkmLVLN0UrNbrAas9s9HA/9SpjNLdTvcKXbqnmSTl34DxfqCE5b 97hJdVXgju59A7Ao3OWQN0ZGgyEO9TOKEAEEmZYeqobOQLD7XsTp3qZs4dBSmxUt zzDNhGQejFjxtwcpNFmDRY8ZpRDJZQNl3zm+1Dwbt/XD42tgoX127Jlw0wFq1HNo JVwNSUcFgJ0ccKikjGoaASsb4vjMSNPnxVc2jNr2JGCnjM0CO+t1saBBhomKF68k QPYgaJ6t9bEiMucLvtor7npwykhzFwDbOEtNO3WmOv1xY9ycvwWIVnGK/fPP6lWZ rRqbw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ZoBUhrIj07zBRcpPnUX93QtGzQdVrt/vG/bMFB2rO jQ=; b=VjB8REzJyVzx3NNRmXldxty5f5OPTRYTF8h0CGFLTnBkCSPa67teMLEel Pl0FLzKBnNjy39+2QPbS9RZCfaj8y02a+10lGpyHJRRvLrJTSKTJlC4RBu3kjF21 5/MfQodRZUApjIUzUHVZBsvWAWM9mUqguXbWJxSuHwMa2O0aUYZdSCgxm54Cjpfn PAcr+XuCg2gQrpEofKx69N4B9P/+ZWWWsOK5bzFGUuRVbieFi0Iu2BLpSEr3PWGz WORNg38bu5sFJ3ihxgdxSUO1j14LxC5io/f2EdIHxKyGXw5Bcn87RoVwbRlWyYJ3 /9cbEiowC6BWas1ZAQD5RTqoc8XtQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:fpOCXMupv2mcv4f-5tKHmCpPup3mVI3BNpXPOYpSf_gmd-IylH4KoA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrgedtgdekiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhishhs rgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecukfhppeduje efrdefkedruddujedrjeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegrlhhishhsrges tghoohhpvghrfidrihhnnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:fpOCXO9D1hCLbeexGH_azJEfBtAjGnuRdbWeHNGQQj89Ivj3HQPUqg> <xmx:fpOCXG14lrnDZCxETJrSjw1vPkARWYLJClSYQzFPMOjpWjXcxS-YcQ> <xmx:fpOCXDhCWInW93qM_f7iFTVJKV1hcKuM4Qo38q0JtM0AVaJXWkk8Ug> <xmx:f5OCXP3NydiGcop50mjzzpX3-aVSLdOwuEsuGYw0f_pmMrV44zSRLA>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro5.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.74]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E4694E4546; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 11:08:29 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <6175C7F84A4F40FDAE2A1CCB@PSB>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 11:08:26 -0500
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, iasa20@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <79791048-1315-48D5-AE10-FC643ED38AA2@cooperw.in>
References: <A7B72177ABB2B2F0BEE7763B@PSB> <567462F2-46E3-445E-BDA3-493DA7AD31CC@cooperw.in> <4faec579-e4dd-f138-4c96-f26d9945c307@gmail.com> <3AC01BB5-613D-474C-B8AE-A85D8F264A83@cooperw.in> <CD6FB2CD65EAEA39265FFD0F@PSB> <610B71DF-46AC-4662-9F5B-70C58A2D872C@cooperw.in> <6175C7F84A4F40FDAE2A1CCB@PSB>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/35Ce-DJcqHPVcRV5n8vOISKny1k>
Subject: Re: [Iasa20] draft-ietf-iasa2-consolidated-upd-06
X-BeenThere: iasa20@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions relating to reorganising the IETF administrative structures in the so called “IASA 2.0” project. <iasa20.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/iasa20/>
List-Post: <mailto:iasa20@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20>, <mailto:iasa20-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 16:08:35 -0000

Hi John,

> On Mar 8, 2019, at 9:53 AM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> --On Friday, March 8, 2019 06:30 -0500 Alissa Cooper
> <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
> 
>> Hi John,
>> ...
>>> However, I, and I assume most WG participants, am much more
>>> interested in getting this work finished than in arguing so,
>>> if you are putting on your Responsible AD hat and telling me
>>> to change this, I will certainly do so.
>> 
>> Yes, I am.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Alissa
> 
> I will try to find the time to make the changes and get a new
> version up over the weekend.  For the record, I believe that a
> single AD making a decision like this without offering evidence
> of either WG or IETF consensus to be an abuse of power and hope
> it does not set a precedent but, as suggested above, as far as
> this document is concerned, I just want to move on.

The point of AD evaluation is to catch things like this. But if the WG chairs would like to issue a consensus call about whether this WG should do something outside its charter, I can wait to request the issuance of the IETF last call until that is done.

The evaluation of IETF consensus will occur after IETF last call has completed.

Thanks,
Alissa

> 
> regards,
>   john
> 
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email