Re: [icnrg] [irsg] Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-icnrg-terminology-07
Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> Mon, 13 January 2020 22:48 UTC
Return-Path: <csp@csperkins.org>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33EF71208B9; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 14:48:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uUi48lD8jc8M; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 14:47:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balrog.mythic-beasts.com (balrog.mythic-beasts.com [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:0:2:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3558A12006D; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 14:47:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [81.187.2.149] (port=47647 helo=[192.168.0.66]) by balrog.mythic-beasts.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <csp@csperkins.org>) id 1ir8Ur-0006Vd-9l; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 22:47:49 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
In-Reply-To: <FAC8A6CD-6FFA-43B5-A61E-CD7CDB8E23C6@orandom.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 22:47:43 +0000
Cc: ICNRG <icnrg@irtf.org>, icnrg-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1027D781-2936-4EC7-836D-D12391816AA1@csperkins.org>
References: <157895325763.32432.8059003395529266421.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FAC8A6CD-6FFA-43B5-A61E-CD7CDB8E23C6@orandom.net>
To: Dave Oran <daveoran@orandom.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-BlackCat-Spam-Score: 4
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/HA7dvHQrzJJvG8poD-O1iGDVH_A>
Subject: Re: [icnrg] [irsg] Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-icnrg-terminology-07
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 22:48:05 -0000
Thanks, Dave. There were minor comments from Benjamin and Mirja on this draft, and from Benjamin and Roman on the icnrg-disaster draft. If you could do a quick rev of each, then they should be ready for the RFC Editor. Colin > On 13 Jan 2020, at 22:14, David R. Oran <daveoran@orandom.net> wrote: > > There are a few editorial comments from Benjamin Kaduk in the IEST history log on the conflict review which probably warrant a new version of the draft to be the one sent to the RFC editor. If Colin and the other ICNRG chars are ok with this, I’ll produce said revision and you can get the RFC editor going on this. > > DaveO > > Forwarded message: > >> From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> >> To: Internet Research Steering Group <irsg@irtf.org>, icnrg-chairs@ietf.org, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>, irtf-chair@irtf.org, Börje Ohlman <Borje.Ohlman@ericsson.com>, draft-irtf-icnrg-terminology@ietf.org >> Cc: iana@iana.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> >> Subject: [irsg] Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-icnrg-terminology-07 >> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 14:07:37 -0800 >> >> The IESG has completed a review of draft-irtf-icnrg-terminology-07 consistent >> with RFC5742. >> >> The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Information-Centric >> Networking (ICN): CCNx and NDN Terminology' >> <draft-irtf-icnrg-terminology-07.txt> as an Informational RFC. >> >> The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and >> IETF work. >> >> The IESG would also like the IRTF to review the comments in the datatracker >> related to this document and determine whether or not they merit >> incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and >> the history log. >> >> The IESG review is documented at: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-irtf-icnrg-terminology/ >> >> A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-icnrg-terminology/ >> >> The process for such documents is described in RFC 5743 >> >> Thank you, >> >> The IESG Secretary -- Colin Perkins https://csperkins.org/
- [icnrg] Fwd: [irsg] Results of IETF-conflict revi… David R. Oran
- Re: [icnrg] [irsg] Results of IETF-conflict revie… Colin Perkins
- Re: [icnrg] [irsg] Results of IETF-conflict revie… Börje Ohlman