Re: [icnrg] Adoption of draft-white-icnrg-ipoc as an ICNRG Draft

Greg White <g.white@CableLabs.com> Wed, 24 July 2019 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <g.white@CableLabs.com>
X-Original-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78EC4120661 for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cablelabs.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n1nRbfU4sKig for <icnrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr790131.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.79.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF0E212061B for <icnrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=m3gnXclVBy/WERmW7qnMksYCzZZeMGRCLVVog1RSbakX573hY/dC84ZzR8wk1gl7YaoYfU4WCI4AKmWtd3n/rhXW/rRNxbcxpt7mFfOevmSN8wfkXKBm8wQVvs9iFJdN4clWq+RSE1ySAeAuiNJ28FNx5Sg6ci4uyjHil0bqxm5Mw9sauioCOaKq+6CqwkxsoiMGTVmjDSEOr3GeqcYu/2QPK6q8U62hoIwVHa0rDKFwdj4Bt83diNFMujWeAeGjV+76RpSr3SvuRuMpxp0GSqmbrB8aPThEha9JoUX4v7Sn6MDyuiD5N5zThC/xPTenF8L3g8rCvUuqbwyx/IE/VA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=JpIsly1cbkpuIcFl5/iiLWPx49HRaVzOwoYn9HJxf3g=; b=W5evqBCrYfUV9m/ZKGDiNhscL9PHnZzKSnWiRFzrMSVm1fVxkRd+/TL7miYeqyogrnaX8devrOzt7ObJW2mFAplKu4c3tym2wWuv8C2UypB1Ch4QNrRiijjiQgjFX9zbx2xfjLkHhIS2B+00O1aTCorDCM+pv5Zof9qRz3KQVTbsRjmHNdPdhtOv/vonQ3sQ2qUzSk4VMtIx3prpZi4c7BdOqP2r4+2EO0VfskSbX6Aom+6P2BEeiot5wSyFVuNVUSU5uzdajBVlotdVqqoH1viOzABTzW6m0QpA/C/tEVse4w5C+mA0ua/WlNJlDhgZ1mhM+FWIg3ZeKP1G2oycxA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1;spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cablelabs.com;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cablelabs.com;dkim=pass header.d=cablelabs.com;arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cablelabs.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=JpIsly1cbkpuIcFl5/iiLWPx49HRaVzOwoYn9HJxf3g=; b=eFkVtRlWZl6QT0uTnxF0wbAF6JMtfbYv1LM2q200feVhjcO0O1QNRGKs4a0RpEpI/swcGxOJlwyHUeMw+Y1rIAvuWAihHPm69LewBa6aqmsU1N2RTZrSyz0e1xvUYc0r1AFdbBObhC148PWy1gX+fRBaRRJSK9iWSPsSkawNe2Y=
Received: from SN6PR06MB4655.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (52.135.117.85) by SN6PR06MB4877.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (52.135.112.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2094.14; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 19:16:16 +0000
Received: from SN6PR06MB4655.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d33:804d:d298:58b3]) by SN6PR06MB4655.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d33:804d:d298:58b3%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2115.005; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 19:16:16 +0000
From: Greg White <g.white@CableLabs.com>
To: "Thomas C. Schmidt" <t.schmidt@haw-hamburg.de>, "icnrg@irtf.org" <icnrg@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: [icnrg] Adoption of draft-white-icnrg-ipoc as an ICNRG Draft
Thread-Index: AQHVQksIdyhT4U1KlUCiQbktBsf4N6bZ4OKA
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 19:16:16 +0000
Message-ID: <5D775A7F-EF7F-4D48-BAF3-6BEDF62CB22B@cablelabs.com>
References: <3955cfa9278f4a1dab9cae339fa2839b@HUB02.mailcluster.haw-hamburg.de> <1db5c479-61c3-f22a-0e39-d66c736790c7@haw-hamburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <1db5c479-61c3-f22a-0e39-d66c736790c7@haw-hamburg.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1a.0.190530
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=g.white@CableLabs.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:67c:370:128:b13a:50ad:8094:d50f]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 060ebf93-b11f-43de-9a6c-08d7106b6683
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:SN6PR06MB4877;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN6PR06MB4877:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 4
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN6PR06MB48774E3EA6EDDC3F737D785DEEC60@SN6PR06MB4877.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0108A997B2
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(346002)(366004)(39850400004)(396003)(376002)(136003)(189003)(199004)(8676002)(53936002)(486006)(68736007)(14444005)(256004)(6246003)(81156014)(71190400001)(71200400001)(5660300002)(64756008)(58126008)(316002)(66476007)(66446008)(86362001)(66556008)(81166006)(91956017)(76116006)(25786009)(19273905006)(110136005)(66946007)(2501003)(186003)(478600001)(99286004)(305945005)(446003)(966005)(14454004)(76176011)(7736002)(6436002)(6486002)(2906002)(66574012)(6306002)(2616005)(36756003)(6512007)(229853002)(53546011)(476003)(6506007)(102836004)(6116002)(46003)(11346002)(33656002)(8936002)(85282002)(563064011); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SN6PR06MB4877; H:SN6PR06MB4655.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: CableLabs.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: EeuOGRIWN5KKBdYvvrnbGe3pUiCwNls7uLptxsCCSxDKNIPHuW+RBwL5WqbVudsc2SDH895ne45UUP+0yyn2MXGfel0cCixwRsZIvulxQBHSAH6IPgQfJ8nXQIDszc+hABON9omqj0XQGFQ7jvx/pMUqZk+9Lxg/Mg3t5DZYF9YQuu84LftCIxbsPeveRZayBZg4OiVkYPcR8u7pVBraw81LbzdTDrXLrPZdCdAV566Of2ObtyQVGJS6KR+gdqKwhj65xsj37nSCNCYVbYElV5sZJqLtKks/l2Tu7GtZoTLfztmm5tgz8ay7RyqMgNppkRYL+LEPakkT5lJiYeSkXjiou7ZN6v4tQHoAfMBGbBID2FPJP89Fce06az/NgCxhlTLWqmS8Bdhuwi8DrnYTYbUQqhoz9RRPHSoQ4EpYO6A=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <EE583F6127F4A64B9C8D6FF2652B09FD@namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: cablelabs.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 060ebf93-b11f-43de-9a6c-08d7106b6683
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Jul 2019 19:16:16.1801 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: ce4fbcd1-1d81-4af0-ad0b-2998c441e160
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: g.white@cablelabs.com
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN6PR06MB4877
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/icnrg/yZwdafH--uWywB1dMb6-nJvz1S8>
Subject: Re: [icnrg] Adoption of draft-white-icnrg-ipoc as an ICNRG Draft
X-BeenThere: icnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Information-Centric Networking research group discussion list <icnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/icnrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:icnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg>, <mailto:icnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 19:16:35 -0000

Thanks Thomas.  

Justification for that claim is provided in the SIGCOMM paper (which I had intended to add to the References list).
https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3229575
I will update the References to include this paper.

We'll have a look at the two RFCs you mentioned and see if we can come up with a good comparison.  Would you be willing to review and comment on  that text once we've got something? 

-Greg


On 7/24/19, 2:10 PM, "icnrg on behalf of Thomas C. Schmidt" <icnrg-bounces@irtf.org on behalf of t.schmidt@haw-hamburg.de>; wrote:

    Hi,
    
    I've participated in several presentations and had a (rather light) look 
    at the document.
    
     From this, I believe the document addresses an important work and 
    should be adopted.
    
    Still I have a couple of immediate remarks that might bring up some 
    additional thinking or work on this subject.
    
    The draft states in its abstract:
       "By leveraging the
        elegant, built-in support for mobility provided by CCN or NDN, this
        protocol achieves performance on par with LTE-EPC, equivalent
        efficiency, and substantially lower implementation and protocol
        complexity."
    Unfortunately, I could not find any substantiation nor justification for 
    this claim, neither in the document nor in references.
    
    As this is a research group document, I would further encourage to 
    include a comparative discussion with Mobile IPv6 (RFC 6275) and - as 
    the ICN approach is more closely related to Multicast - with Multicast 
    Mobility (see RFC 5757).
    
    Cheers,
      Thomas
    
    
    On 24/07/2019 11:11, David R. Oran wrote:
    > Folks,
    > 
    > At the ICNRG Interim meeting before IETF 105, the chairs proposed we
    > adopt the IPOC work as a Research Group draft for progression. There was
    > support for this at the meeting, so we are issuing this call on the list
    > to confirm this decision. If we hear no objections by Friday July 26, we
    > will adopt the draft. No need for ACKs; only NACK if anyone has
    > objections to this course of action.
    > 
    > The current draft is at
    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-white-icnrg-ipoc/.
    > 
    > Many thanks,
    > 
    > DaveO, Börje, and Dirk.
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > icnrg mailing list
    > icnrg@irtf.org
    > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg
    > 
    
    -- 
    
    Prof. Dr. Thomas C. Schmidt
    ° Hamburg University of Applied Sciences                  Berliner Tor 7 °
    ° Dept. Informatik, Internet Technologies Group   20099 Hamburg, Germany °
    ° http://inet.haw-hamburg.de/members/schmidt      Fon: +49-40-42875-8452 °
    
    _______________________________________________
    icnrg mailing list
    icnrg@irtf.org
    https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/icnrg