[Idr] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-sriram-idr-route-leak-detection-mitigation-01

"Sriram, Kotikalapudi" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov> Sun, 05 July 2015 13:39 UTC

Return-Path: <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C16D1A88C8 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 06:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d7ODdHoY9pTv for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 06:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0793.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:793]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5458A1A88C6 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 06:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CY1PR09MB0793.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.163.43.143) by CY1PR09MB0793.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.163.43.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.207.19; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 13:38:44 +0000
Received: from CY1PR09MB0793.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.43.143]) by CY1PR09MB0793.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.43.143]) with mapi id 15.01.0207.004; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 13:38:44 +0000
From: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
To: "idr@ietf.org wg" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-sriram-idr-route-leak-detection-mitigation-01
Thread-Index: AQHQtyfpDU8TLSohskOiYmZoVpjb0Q==
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 13:38:44 +0000
Message-ID: <CY1PR09MB079341C1DC3BB2C35C4F6A0584940@CY1PR09MB0793.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20150705122638.1407.91341.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150705122638.1407.91341.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ndzh.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-originating-ip: [129.6.218.169]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1PR09MB0793; 5:7oO2uaxTCuu0b/aeb8sUOEAPufo2b2vaxmw9wgrBwBlut6UjaZtnGRXB4wVw2DcIEfmZzC5ctRLP3nA+ejWjZ1oX0PMjHYxB0IDTPAnuiqP3e+cWVfF9KNWB687Fb5oxtV4RCjbklij5oXmUCNPiLg==; 24:HuzHmpg0OMFPNtGMva6JbZP771be5AhCLh0gv6P83Mk3z09V1qNsHcpJwWRoRa3jTdzF0zxECK3pr+0bkPGQUpZBzYVAY4Bex7b9ra+zJrk=; 20:5eznSWnRUY5tgY4l9Q6dH0LlkWnk25qRvKw0QBvE2jI6FbD4BKAXbGisGP2FzFkAnpXPyfgeTLosxFFrEKMNmQ==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR09MB0793;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY1PR09MB079374E4F13BDA377637ECE884940@CY1PR09MB0793.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:CY1PR09MB0793; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR09MB0793;
x-forefront-prvs: 062899525A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(243025005)(377454003)(377424004)(92566002)(106116001)(76576001)(33656002)(122556002)(66066001)(62966003)(40100003)(46102003)(77156002)(74316001)(99286002)(5002640100001)(76176999)(54356999)(19580395003)(5001960100002)(50986999)(19580405001)(110136002)(86362001)(2900100001)(2950100001)(230783001)(77096005)(2420400003)(102836002)(15975445007)(2656002)(189998001)(87936001)(5003600100002)(7059030); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR09MB0793; H:CY1PR09MB0793.namprd09.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nist.gov
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Jul 2015 13:38:44.7236 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2ab5d82f-d8fa-4797-a93e-054655c61dec
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR09MB0793
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/-t8fum4iQJHlwcAkyL-1N1XW9v4>
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: [Idr] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-sriram-idr-route-leak-detection-mitigation-01
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 13:39:06 -0000

We (the authors) have just submitted an updated -01 version:

https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sriram-idr-route-leak-detection-mitigation-01.txt
 
Sue had posted a WG adoption call request (with -00 version):
 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/current/msg14550.html
  
Please take a look at the updated version. The diff can be viewed at:

https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-sriram-idr-route-leak-detection-mitigation-01 

Key changes (in -01 version relative to -00):
* Section 2 -  Related Prior Work - has been newly added
* There is substantial new material in Section 5:  Design Rationale and Discussion.
* Many useful changes have been made to improve the presentation and clarity.
* Brian Dickson has been added as a co-author.

This work was presented in Dallas, and again an updated version was presented in the
IDR interim meeting on June 29. The slides of the presentation are at:

http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/interim/2015/06/29/idr/slides/slides-interim-2015-idr-7-0.pdf  

Comments/questions would be very much appreciated.

Sriram
 
________________________________________
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 5, 2015 8:26 AM

A new version of I-D, draft-sriram-idr-route-leak-detection-mitigation-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Kotikalapudi Sriram and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-sriram-idr-route-leak-detection-mitigation
Revision:       01
Title:          Methods for Detection and Mitigation of BGP Route Leaks
Document date:  2015-07-05
Group:          idr
Pages:          17
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sriram-idr-route-leak-detection-mitigation-01.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sriram-idr-route-leak-detection-mitigation/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sriram-idr-route-leak-detection-mitigation-01
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-sriram-idr-route-leak-detection-mitigation-01

Abstract:
   In [I-D.ietf-grow-route-leak-problem-definition], the authors have
   provided a definition of the route leak problem, and also enumerated
   several types of route leaks.  In this document, we first examine
   which of those route-leak types are detected and mitigated by the
   existing origin validation (OV) [RFC 6811] and BGPSEC path validation
   [I-D.ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol].  Where the current OV and BGPSEC
   protocols don't offer a solution, this document suggests an
   enhancement that would extend the route-leak detection and mitigation
   capability of BGPSEC.  The solution can be implemented in BGP without
   necessarily tying it to BGPSEC.  Incorporating the solution in BGPSEC
   is one way of implementing it in a secure way.  We do not claim to
   have provided a solution for all possible types of route leaks, but
   the solution covers several, especially considering some significant
   route-leak attacks or occurrences that have been observed in recent
   years.  The document also includes a stopgap method for detection and
   mitigation of route leaks for the phase when BGPSEC (path validation)
   is not yet deployed but only origin validation is deployed.