Re: Re: Re: [Idr] why has 4096 bytes limit on BGP messages size?

"Fenggen Jia" <fgjia@mail.zjgsu.edu.cn > Mon, 18 June 2007 01:13 UTC

Return-path: <idr-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I05o4-0005SC-8r; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:13:24 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I05o3-0005O9-9S for idr@ietf.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:13:23 -0400
Received: from [202.96.99.56] (helo=mailgate.zjgsu.edu.cn) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I05o1-0003qr-85 for idr@ietf.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:13:23 -0400
Received: from [202.96.99.59] by 202.96.99.56 with StormMail ESMTP id 50203.2516453744; Sat, 16 Jun 2007 09:01:12 +0800 (CST)
Received: from jiafenggen (nat.zjgsu.edu.cn [202.96.99.60]) by mail.zjgsu.edu.cn (Postfix) with SMTP id EB17F1140496; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 09:09:11 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 09:12:25 +0800
From: Fenggen Jia <fgjia@mail.zjgsu.edu.cn>
To: idr <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [Idr] why has 4096 bytes limit on BGP messages size?
X-mailer: Foxmail 5.0 [cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <20070618010911.EB17F1140496@mail.zjgsu.edu.cn>
X-Spam-Score: 4.2 (++++)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
Cc: tli <tli@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0029301157=="
Errors-To: idr-bounces@ietf.org

hi,all,
	I think my inital question is why the protocol has 4K limit on messages sizes,that is different from the implementation,an implementation may chose to use large read or write buffer(>4K) to handle multiple updates one time,still my question is if message size limit is a good pratice in protocol design?
Yours,Fenggen

>Then why not other limit,how is 4096 bytes derived, thanks.BTW,whether it's a good pratice in protocol devise to limit message sizes?I see in ripV1 that the maximum PDU length is 576bytes its reason is to avoid IP fragmentation,but in ripng the PDU length is determined only by the link MTU,and in snmp i also doesn't see the message size limit. 
>Yours,Fenggen
>>
>>On Jun 13, 2007, at 10:01 PM, Fenggen Jia wrote:
>>
>>> hi,all,
>>>       I am wondering why BGP has 4096 bytes limit on all its  
>>> messages,should we leave it to the implementator to decide,thanks!
>>
>>
>>Well, the problem with that is that a sender could then create an  
>>arbitrarily long message, which could be arbitrarily problematic for  
>>a receiver.
>>
>>Tony
>>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Idr mailing list
>Idr@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
			

        致
礼!
 
				 
        Fenggen Jia
        fgjia@mail.zjgsu.edu.cn  
          2007-06-18

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr