IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-09

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Fri, 03 June 2016 15:10 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F7D12D1D4; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 08:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WitrCu-TUkmI; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 08:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 623F4128E19; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 08:10:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: idr@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.local (089-101-195156.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.156] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u53FA5nF026126 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Jun 2016 16:10:05 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host 089-101-195156.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.156] (may be forged) claimed to be crumpet.local
Message-ID: <57519DCC.6050400@foobar.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 16:10:04 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.8 (Macintosh/20151105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
References: <D29085C4.EFB5A%aretana@cisco.com> <5723E3B4.4090103@foobar.org> <D36A0E05.1277AB%aretana@cisco.com> <574EF89D.6080206@inex.ie> <D3749E53.12A346%aretana@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D3749E53.12A346%aretana@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/B8oCQFBeSIBKwM1EQThM3yTdYL8>
Cc: "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, "shares@ndzh.com" <shares@ndzh.com>, "draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-09
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 15:10:16 -0000

Alvaro Retana (aretana) wrote:
> Those are not problems.  Standards track documents point at Informational
> documents all the time, as long as the reference is not Normative, then
> it's ok.  In this case, I think it would be beneficial to tell people
> reading draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server that there are operational
> considerations (as an informational reference) somewhere else.

I'll put a link in then, and will update this in AUTH48.  Thanks for the
suggestion - there was conflicting information about circular references.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email