Re: Re: [Idr] why has 4096 bytes limit on BGP messages size?

"Fenggen Jia" <fgjia@mail.zjgsu.edu.cn > Thu, 14 June 2007 10:59 UTC

Return-path: <idr-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hyn2b-0002ZN-33; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 06:59:01 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hyn2a-0002ZE-1A for idr@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 06:59:00 -0400
Received: from [202.96.99.56] (helo=mailgate.zjgsu.edu.cn) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hyn2V-0007tm-Th for idr@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 06:58:59 -0400
Received: from [202.96.99.59] by 202.96.99.56 with StormMail ESMTP id 50203.2516453744; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:47:01 +0800 (CST)
Received: from jiafenggen (nat.zjgsu.edu.cn [202.96.99.60]) by mail.zjgsu.edu.cn (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C6C11140496; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:54:51 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:58:06 +0800
From: Fenggen Jia <fgjia@mail.zjgsu.edu.cn>
To: idr <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [Idr] why has 4096 bytes limit on BGP messages size?
X-mailer: Foxmail 5.0 [cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20070614105451.9C6C11140496@mail.zjgsu.edu.cn>
X-Spam-Score: 4.1 (++++)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Cc: tli <tli@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: idr-bounces@ietf.org

Then why not other limit,how is 4096 bytes derived, thanks.BTW,whether it's a good pratice in protocol devise to limit message sizes?I see in ripV1 that the maximum PDU length is 576bytes its reason is to avoid IP fragmentation,but in ripng the PDU length is determined only by the link MTU,and in snmp i also doesn't see the message size limit. 
Yours,Fenggen
>
>On Jun 13, 2007, at 10:01 PM, Fenggen Jia wrote:
>
>> hi,all,
>>       I am wondering why BGP has 4096 bytes limit on all its  
>> messages,should we leave it to the implementator to decide,thanks!
>
>
>Well, the problem with that is that a sender could then create an  
>arbitrarily long message, which could be arbitrarily problematic for  
>a receiver.
>
>Tony
>




_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr