[Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4271 (3809)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 22 November 2013 05:56 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C361AE2C4 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 21:56:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.427
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.427 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P5xzXy1maLTg for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 21:56:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:126c::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F3A1AE2A1 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 21:56:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 5309C75E018; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 21:46:23 -0800 (PST)
To: yakov@juniper.net, tony.li@tony.li, skh@nexthop.com, stbryant@cisco.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, shares@ndzh.com, jgs@juniper.net
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20131122054623.5309C75E018@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 21:46:23 -0800
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:56:12 -0800
Cc: idr@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4271 (3809)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 05:56:56 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4271,
"A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4271&eid=3809

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Ramakrishna DTV <ramakrishnadtv@infosys.com>

Section: 6

Original Text
-------------
   Before the invalid routes are deleted
   from the system, it advertises, to its peers, either withdraws for
   the routes marked as invalid, or the new best routes before the
   invalid routes are deleted from the system.

Corrected Text
--------------
   Before the invalid routes are deleted
   from the system, it advertises, to its peers, either withdraws for
   the routes marked as invalid, or the new best routes.

Notes
-----
The phrase "Before the invalid routes are deleted from the system" is unnecessarily repeated in the same sentence.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC4271 (draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-26)
--------------------------------------
Title               : A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)
Publication Date    : January 2006
Author(s)           : Y. Rekhter, Ed., T. Li, Ed., S. Hares, Ed.
Category            : DRAFT STANDARD
Source              : Inter-Domain Routing
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG