Re: [Idr] [Feedback request] Are there implementations of draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-ip-02 out there?
Zhuangshunwan <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com> Mon, 14 March 2016 05:51 UTC
Return-Path: <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B999112DA2E for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 22:51:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OET5toBdJTfo for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 22:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FE6112D8C3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 22:51:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CFY07951; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 05:51:43 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.70) by lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.182) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 05:51:41 +0000
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:51:34 +0800
From: Zhuangshunwan <zhuangshunwan@huawei.com>
To: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Feedback request] Are there implementations of draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-ip-02 out there?
Thread-Index: AQHRaMIwf2HTDCcwb0qQXOqjdaaCNZ9Ykzxw
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 05:51:34 +0000
Message-ID: <19AB2A007F56DB4E8257F949A2FB9858AA1A1713@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <09D3C0C6-E1B5-496B-82C9-93D7A745E196@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <09D3C0C6-E1B5-496B-82C9-93D7A745E196@alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.86.254]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_19AB2A007F56DB4E8257F949A2FB9858AA1A1713NKGEML515MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020206.56E6516F.00E0, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: d57e347661a8a7b9a3d48c6e3c04f527
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/k2n3lWIuqDQPqZ-ts0c8QkRU1jA>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [Feedback request] Are there implementations of draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-ip-02 out there?
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 05:51:49 -0000
Hi All, I also want to know the answer that Gunter requested. I know some current implementations per draft-simpson-idr-flowspec-redirect-02: Redirect NextHop is encoded as the MP_REACH NextHop in the BGP flowspec NLRI along with associated extended community 0x0800. When some Network Operation Systems intend to implement Redirect NextHop function, they have to do draft-simpson-idr-flowspec-redirect-02 instead of draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-ip for interoperability requirements. When should the implementations be consistent with WG doc draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-ip? Regards, Shunwan 发件人: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE) 发送时间: 2016年2月16日 21:59 收件人: idr@ietf.org 主题: [Idr] [Feedback request] Are there implementations of draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-ip-02 out there? Hi All, I already did a pre-check with the co-authors of this draft already, and am now reaching out to the IDR WG. In the backend process of helping Wim/Adam regarding draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-ip to request IANA an extended community sub-type to further update the draft i was wondering if any implemented draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-ip-01 or draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-redirect-ip-02 ? If yes, what is the sub-type you used? I understood that some potentially implemented earlier draft-simpson-idr-flowspec-redirect-02 , but that one is effectively being deprecated. Many thanks for your responses, G/
- [Idr] [Feedback request] Are there implementation… Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [Idr] [Feedback request] Are there implementa… Zhuangshunwan