Re: (mobile-ip) Mobile-IP Layers
Zhigang Liu <zliu1@shrike.depaul.edu> Sun, 10 May 1998 19:47 UTC
Delivery-Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 15:47:23 -0400
Return-Path: owner-mobile-ip@smallworks.com
Received: from cnri.reston.va.us (ns.cnri.reston.va.us [132.151.1.1]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id PAA06486 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 May 1998 15:47:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hosaka.smallworks.com (hosaka.SmallWorks.COM [192.207.126.1]) by cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id PAA00923 for <ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us>; Sun, 10 May 1998 15:49:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by hosaka.smallworks.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA04153 for mobile-ip-dist; Sun, 10 May 1998 14:25:10 -0500 (CDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: hosaka.smallworks.com: majordomo set sender to owner-mobile-ip using -f
Received: from shrike.depaul.edu (zliu1@shrike.depaul.edu [140.192.1.10]) by hosaka.smallworks.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA04145 for <mobile-ip@smallworks.com>; Sun, 10 May 1998 14:24:37 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (zliu1@localhost) by shrike.depaul.edu (8.8.3/8.5) with SMTP id OAA01653; Sun, 10 May 1998 14:20:37 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sun, 10 May 1998 14:20:36 -0500
From: Zhigang Liu <zliu1@shrike.depaul.edu>
To: Baher Esmat <bali@idsc.gov.eg>
cc: mobile-ip@smallworks.com
Subject: Re: (mobile-ip) Mobile-IP Layers
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19980510165419.00898820@idsc.gov.eg>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.980510141646.899A-100000@shrike.depaul.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-mobile-ip@smallworks.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Zhigang Liu <zliu1@shrike.depaul.edu>
I don't think there is a need to change the transport layer in mobile-ip. The only change should be made in IP layer. Isn't that a way the layered protocol engineering should be? Zhigang On Sun, 10 May 1998, Baher Esmat wrote: > Hi all, > Concerning the conventional TCP/IP layering scheme, there was the > Transport layer lying up to the Internet layer... If we switch to the > Mobile-IP architecture, and assuming that our applications as well as the > physical media are the same, what changes may happen to the Transport > layer??? > Thanks... > > > > > ____________________________________________________ > Baher A. Esmat > Communications & Networking Department > IDSC/RITSEC > 11A Hassan Sabry st. Zamalek > Cairo - Egypt > Tel. 202-3391375 > Fax. 202-3412139 > E-mail bali@idsc.gov.eg > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF Mobile IP Working Group Mailing List - Archives: software.watson.ibm.com > Unsubscribe: unsubscribe mobile-ip (as message body, not subject) > Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@smallworks.com > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF Mobile IP Working Group Mailing List - Archives: software.watson.ibm.com Unsubscribe: unsubscribe mobile-ip (as message body, not subject) Direct all administrative requests to majordomo@smallworks.com
- Re: (mobile-ip) Mobile-IP Layers Gerald Maguire
- Re: (mobile-ip) Mobile-IP Layers Zhigang Liu