IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ieee-ietf-coord] Coordination Gathering Needed in Prague?

Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com> Fri, 15 March 2019 15:29 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@akayla.com>
X-Original-To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765BD12D4F0 for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 08:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mH_dOskEIiuj for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 08:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa12-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa12-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [68.178.252.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6C22130E25 for <ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 08:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.100.17.64] ([64.141.80.150]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPSA id 4olshetp825bc4olshe4nT; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 08:29:21 -0700
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.17.0.190309
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 08:29:19 -0700
From: Peter Yee <peter@akayla.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>, ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org
Message-ID: <B385BFE2-A09D-44D1-85FD-30254B97C7B6@akayla.com>
Thread-Topic: [ieee-ietf-coord] Coordination Gathering Needed in Prague?
References: <8F6BA90D-0324-4094-ABAC-871BA0309496@vigilsec.com> <84400696-f0b4-0c6e-18b9-fefd60e72974@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <84400696-f0b4-0c6e-18b9-fefd60e72974@gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfMcGBfNMTYENuST34JWyfmdAEUrt+ZJrC7oPIUhmTRgIsMa6eTRUZTsNsyIsi3OYYrWMPyyG23/V/Ibq12HkLqbZQDIXTiyx41EtCL+6jfhKrMGRxSkF CFi7vBAn2/OhgcmmP1YjvY4tRbDxZzJ0P9y1KwqIoA0vbjFJZi/iuF9/yPpu/ugsDX2bSd/XRu0uZUQQ1HTCyf3Ljj5kAh0Z/Yo=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ieee-ietf-coord/v9ihlevNSTB-mMKERsiLsUb3JDc>
Subject: Re: [ieee-ietf-coord] Coordination Gathering Needed in Prague?
X-BeenThere: ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Management-level discussions between IEEE and IETF on topics of interest to both SDOs <ieee-ietf-coord.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ieee-ietf-coord>, <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ieee-ietf-coord/>
List-Post: <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieee-ietf-coord>, <mailto:ieee-ietf-coord-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 15:29:25 -0000

Ethertype 0x8948 is already assigned (although not listed on the IANA's page for Ethertypes, which is not the definitive listing of Ethertypes).  If you have a need for an Ethertype, you should reference RFC 7042 (Section 3) and the IANA's IEEE 802 Numbers page (https://www.iana.org/assignments/ieee-802-numbers/ieee-802-numbers.xhtml)  for more information.  Donald Eastlake (primary) and Juan Carlos Zuniga (secondary) are the IANA-designated experts for Ethertypes.

		-Peter

On 3/15/19, 3:14 AM, "ieee-ietf-coord on behalf of Alexandre Petrescu" <ieee-ietf-coord-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

One of my collaborators (RSU manufacturer) asked me in private which 
EtherType to use  other than the allocated 0x8947 for GeoNetworking, on 
which to send CAM messages from car to Road-Side Units that use empty 
GeoNetworking and BTP headers.

These are not IP messages, but are transmitted on IEEE 802.11 OCB.  They 
do contain ETSI GeoNetworking headers but these headers are empty 
because we dont trust their necessity.

We agreed to put such CAMs with empty GeoNetowrking headers present both 
on cars and on Road-Side Units, we agreed to put at a particular 5.9GHz 
channel, but we explore which EtherType to use.

Is there some 'trial' EtherType for vehicles, which would not disturb 
others, be future proof, be available immediately (in the following 
months).

I thought to suggest 0x8948 (the next after 0x8947) but I dont know.

Alex

Le 20/02/2019 à 20:53, Russ Housley a écrit :
> During the coordination call today, no one had a topic that needed a gathering in Prague.  Since some of you could not make the call, we wanted to ask the list before deciding that there was not a reason to get together.  If you know of a topic, please speak now.
> 
> Russ
>   
> _______________________________________________
> ieee-ietf-coord mailing list
> ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieee-ietf-coord
> 

_______________________________________________
ieee-ietf-coord mailing list
ieee-ietf-coord@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ieee-ietf-coord

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email