Re: [Ietf-62] I don't think your problems are solved yet

Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com> Thu, 10 March 2005 15:15 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA23371; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:15:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D9PQO-0004vR-Jz; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:18:08 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D9PMn-0000kg-OU; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:14:25 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D9PMm-0000kb-7v for ietf-62@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:14:24 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA23257 for <ietf-62@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:14:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com ([206.197.161.140]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D9PPa-0004pR-1W for ietf-62@ietf.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:17:19 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost.fuaim.com [127.0.0.1]) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC8FB88B; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:14:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (uillean.fuaim.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 44632-01-2; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:14:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach-high.fuaim.com [IPv6:3ffe:1200:3033:1::158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3904B84F; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:14:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.129.135.101] (wireless-130-129-135-101.ietf62.ietf.org [130.129.135.101]) (authenticated bits=0) by clairseach.fuaim.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j2AFRX4J014667 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:27:36 -0800
In-Reply-To: <20050309115857.6c5a65d0@garlique>
References: <20050309115857.6c5a65d0@garlique>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <769b9e2adfbe2bb11d6d1d58eb7151dc@daedelus.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com>
Subject: Re: [Ietf-62] I don't think your problems are solved yet
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:14:02 -0600
To: George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8b30eb7682a596edff707698f4a80f7d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf-62@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf-62@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-62 Mailing List <ietf-62.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-62>, <mailto:ietf-62-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf-62>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-62@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-62-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-62>, <mailto:ietf-62-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-62-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-62-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

George,
	While I definitely am aware that in high-density places that we've got 
some slowness on the wireless side. However, this is the first I've 
heard of /wired/ issues. I certainly understand that you've got real 
IETF work to do, but if you have a minute, could you please swing by 
the NOC (door in the far back corner of the terminal room) and we'd 
love to do some tests. Actually, if you've got a host or two at home 
that seem slow, let us know and we'll do what analysis we can now....

	And, of course, sorry for the hassle, /whatever/ the reason...

	- Jim

On Mar 9, 2005, at 11:58 AM, George Michaelson wrote:

>
> I don't think all your problems are solved yet.
>
> 	slow DHCP bind
> 	slow router response.
> 	off-net b/w appears bad (I'm in the irish pub, I have 4-5x the b/w 
> out)
> 	ietf62-wep was unusable, ietf62 barely, the reverse of the day(s) 
> before
>
> even the wired network has been.. bad. extremely bad.
>
> Am I the only one seeing this? The straw poll of my peers in the WG
> suggests nobody feels 'you fixed it' .
>
> sorry to be a Jeremiah.
>
> -G
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-62 mailing list
> Ietf-62@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-62


_______________________________________________
Ietf-62 mailing list
Ietf-62@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-62